Suppr超能文献

两种改良髓内固定系统治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折的生物力学评估:有限元分析

Biomechanical evaluation of two modified intramedullary fixation system for treating unstable femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis.

作者信息

Huang Qiang, Zhang CongMing, Bai HuanAn, Wang Qian, Li Zhong, Lu Yao, Ma Teng

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Hong Hui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Feb 21;11:1116976. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1116976. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

The existing implants for fixation of femoral neck fractures have poor biomechanical stability, so the failure rate is high. We designed two modified intramedullary implants for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). We tried to improve the biomechanical stability of fixation by shortening the moment and reducing stress concentration. Each modified intramedullary implant was compared with cannulated screws (CSs) through finite element analysis (FEA). Five different models were included: three cannulated screws (CSs, Model 1) in an inverted triangle configuration, the dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHS + AS, Model 2), the femoral neck system (FNS, Model 3), the modified intramedullary femoral neck system (IFNS, Model 4), and the modified intramedullary interlocking system (IIS, Model 5). Three-dimensional (3D) models of femur and implants were constructed by using 3D modelling software. Three load cases were simulated to assess the maximal displacement of models and fracture surface. The maximal stress at the bone and implants was also evaluated. FEA data showed that Model 5 had the best performance in terms of maximum displacement while Model 1 had the worst performance for this index under axial load of 2100 N. With respect to Maximum stress, Model 4 had the best performance while Model 2 had the worst performance under axial load. The general trends under bending and torsion load were consistent with that under axial load. Our data demonstrated that the two modified intramedullary implants exhibited the best biomechanical stability, followed by FNS and DHS + AS, and then three cannulated screws in axial, bending, and torsion load cases. The two modified intramedullary designs showed the best biomechanical performance among the five implants included in this study. Therefore, this might provide some new options for trauma surgeons to deal with unstable femoral neck fractures.

摘要

现有的用于固定股骨颈骨折的植入物生物力学稳定性较差,因此失败率较高。我们设计了两种改良髓内植入物用于治疗不稳定型股骨颈骨折(UFNFs)。我们试图通过缩短力矩和减少应力集中来提高固定的生物力学稳定性。通过有限元分析(FEA)将每种改良髓内植入物与空心钉(CSs)进行比较。包括五种不同模型:呈倒三角形配置的三枚空心钉(CSs,模型1)、带防旋螺钉的动力髋螺钉(DHS + AS,模型2)、股骨颈系统(FNS,模型3)、改良髓内股骨颈系统(IFNS,模型4)以及改良髓内锁定系统(IIS,模型5)。使用三维建模软件构建股骨和植入物的三维(3D)模型。模拟三种加载情况以评估模型和骨折面的最大位移。还评估了骨骼和植入物处的最大应力。有限元分析数据表明,在2100 N轴向载荷下,模型5在最大位移方面表现最佳,而模型1在此指标上表现最差。关于最大应力,在轴向载荷下模型4表现最佳,而模型2表现最差。弯曲和扭转载荷下的总体趋势与轴向载荷下一致。我们的数据表明,在轴向、弯曲和扭转载荷情况下,这两种改良髓内植入物表现出最佳的生物力学稳定性,其次是FNS和DHS + AS,然后是三枚空心钉。在本研究纳入的五种植入物中,这两种改良髓内设计显示出最佳的生物力学性能。因此,这可能为创伤外科医生处理不稳定型股骨颈骨折提供一些新的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1029/9989215/780edb5c0509/fbioe-11-1116976-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验