School of Psychology, The University of Sydney.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney.
J Sex Res. 2023 May-Jun;60(5):611-623. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2023.2182267. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
Previous research has identified a range of perceptual voice and speech features that differ between gay and straight men, enabling listeners to determine if a man is gay or straight at a rate better than chance from his voice alone. To date, no published studies have examined if bisexual men's voices differ from gay and straight men's voices with regard to perceived masculinity-femininity - nor whether listeners can identify a bisexual man based only on his voice. In the present study, we examined if listeners could identify bisexual men's sexual identities from voice recordings. Seventy participants (= 70) rated 60 voice recordings of a sample of 20 gay, 20 bisexual, and 20 straight Australian men on perceived sexual orientation and degree of masculinity-femininity. Participants could correctly categorize the sexual orientations of the gay and straight speakers at rates greater than chance, but bisexual men were only identified at chance. Bisexual voices were consistently misperceived as being the most exclusively female attracted, and, contrary to expectations, were perceived as the most masculine sounding of all the speakers. Together, these findings suggest that while the voices of bisexual men in our sample were perceived as more masculine and female attracted, listeners do not associate this impression with bisexuality, and thus cannot identify bisexual men from their voices. Consequently, while bisexual men appear to be at lower risk of facing voice-based identification and discrimination than gay men, they may be often misperceived as being straight.
先前的研究已经确定了一系列在同性恋和异性恋男性之间存在差异的感知声音和语音特征,使听众能够仅从声音就判断出一个男人是同性恋还是异性恋,而且准确率高于随机。迄今为止,尚无已发表的研究探讨双性恋男性的声音在可感知的男性化-女性化方面是否与同性恋和异性恋男性的声音不同,也没有研究探讨听众是否可以仅凭声音识别出双性恋男性。在本研究中,我们检验了听众是否可以从语音记录中识别出双性恋男性的性身份。70 名参与者(=70)对 60 个语音记录进行了评分,这些语音记录来自 20 名同性恋、20 名双性恋和 20 名异性恋澳大利亚男性,以感知性取向和男性化-女性化程度。参与者可以正确识别出同性恋和异性恋说话者的性取向,准确率高于随机,但无法正确识别双性恋说话者的性取向。双性恋者的声音被一致认为是最女性化的,与预期相反,他们被认为是所有说话者中声音最男性化的。总之,这些发现表明,虽然我们样本中的双性恋男性的声音被认为更男性化和更女性化,但听众不会将这种印象与双性恋联系起来,因此无法从声音中识别出双性恋男性。因此,虽然双性恋男性似乎比同性恋男性面临基于声音的识别和歧视的风险较低,但他们可能经常被误解为异性恋者。