• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Seclusion on Mental Health Status in Hospitalized Psychiatric Populations: A Trial Emulation using Observational Data.隔离对住院精神科人群心理健康状况的影响:使用观察数据进行的试验模拟。
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Mar;47(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/01632787231164489. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Effect of coercive measures on mental health status in adult psychiatric populations: a nationwide trial emulation.强制性措施对成年精神科人群心理健康状况的影响:全国性试验模拟。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Sep 12;33:e35. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000416.
3
Seclusion within the first 24 h following admission into inpatient mental health services and associations with referral pathways, recent service contact and HoNOS ratings.在入住住院心理健康服务机构后的 24 小时内进行隔离,以及与转介途径、最近的服务接触和 HoNOS 评分的关联。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Jun;31(3):417-429. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12999. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
People who experience seclusion in adult mental health inpatient services: An examination of health of the nation outcome scales scores.在成人心理健康住院服务中被隔离的人:国民健康结果量表评分的考察。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Feb;28(1):199-208. doi: 10.1111/inm.12521. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
5
Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units.老年精神病住院患者中约束和隔离的流行率及危险因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03095-4.
6
[About the use of seclusion in psychiatry: the patients' point of view].[关于精神病学中隔离措施的使用:患者视角]
Encephale. 2004 May-Jun;30(3):276-84. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95440-1.
7
Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.与成人住院精神卫生服务中心使用精神科强化护理和隔离相关的因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Feb;27(1):51-61. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000731. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
Factors associated with the use of seclusion in an inpatient psychiatric unit in Lilongwe, Malawi.马拉维利隆圭一家住院精神科病房中与使用隔离相关的因素。
Malawi Med J. 2018 Sep;30(3):197-204. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v30i3.12.
9
[Duration of seclusion and exit of the seclusion room, study of the impact of anamnestic and institutional factors].[隔离时长与隔离室出院情况,既往史及机构因素影响的研究]
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):184-189. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion.精神科病房物理环境对隔离使用的影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;202:142-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118422. Epub 2013 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Coercive Measures in Psychiatry Can Hardly Be Justified in Principle Any Longer-Ethico-Legal Requirements Versus Empirical Research Data and Conceptual Issues.精神病学中的强制手段原则上几乎不再合理——伦理法律要求与实证研究数据及概念问题
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Apr;32(2):461-466. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13129. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Effect of coercive measures on mental health status in adult psychiatric populations: a nationwide trial emulation.强制性措施对成年精神科人群心理健康状况的影响:全国性试验模拟。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Sep 12;33:e35. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000416.

本文引用的文献

1
"Our Patients Are Different": Predictors of Seclusion and Restraint in 31 Psychiatric Hospitals.“我们的患者与众不同”:31家精神病医院中隔离与约束措施的预测因素
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 26;13:791333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.791333. eCollection 2022.
2
Causal analyses of existing databases: no power calculations required.对现有数据库进行因果分析:无需进行功效计算。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;144:203-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.028. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
3
Risk factors associated with use of coercive practices in adult mental health inpatients: A systematic review.与成人精神科住院患者使用强制性措施相关的风险因素:系统评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;29(2):220-239. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12757. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
4
Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units.老年精神病住院患者中约束和隔离的流行率及危险因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 8;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03095-4.
5
Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID-19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes.利用协变量调整提高 COVID-19 治疗随机试验的精度和功效,适用于二分类、有序和生存时间结局。
Biometrics. 2021 Dec;77(4):1467-1481. doi: 10.1111/biom.13377. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
6
Efficacy of interventions to reduce coercive treatment in mental health services: umbrella review of randomised evidence.减少精神卫生服务中强制治疗的干预措施的效果:随机证据的系统评价
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;218(4):185-195. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.144.
7
Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies.预防和减少精神卫生服务中的“强制”现象:一项针对英文文献的国际范围综述。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jul;142(1):27-39. doi: 10.1111/acps.13152. Epub 2020 Feb 9.
8
An end to coercion: rights and decision-making in mental health care.结束强制:精神卫生保健中的权利和决策。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Jan 1;98(1):52-58. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.234906. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Influence of nursing staff attitudes and characteristics on the use of coercive measures in acute mental health services-A systematic review.护理人员态度和特征对急性精神卫生服务中强制手段使用的影响——一项系统综述
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):446-459. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12586. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.成人精神病学中隔离与约束的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 16;10:491. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00491. eCollection 2019.

隔离对住院精神科人群心理健康状况的影响:使用观察数据进行的试验模拟。

Effect of Seclusion on Mental Health Status in Hospitalized Psychiatric Populations: A Trial Emulation using Observational Data.

机构信息

Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Division of Prison Health, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2024 Mar;47(1):3-10. doi: 10.1177/01632787231164489. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1177/01632787231164489
PMID:36898680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10858627/
Abstract

The use of coercive practices, i.e., interventions against a person's will, is controversial. Recent observational studies highlighted their potential detrimental effects on patients' mental health, but this topic remains understudied. This study investigated the effect of a common coercive practice, seclusion (i.e., being locked in a closed room), on mental health using a trial emulation of observational data to allow causal inference. We used data from 1200 psychiatric inpatients, classified as being either secluded or non-secluded during their hospital stay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to emulate the random assignment to the intervention. The primary outcome was the Health of the Nations Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The secondary outcome was the first item of the HoNOS, which focuses on overactive, aggressive, disruptive, or agitated behavior. Both outcomes were assessed at hospital discharge. There was a significant effect of seclusion with increases in both total HoNOS score ( = .002) and item 1 of the HoNOS ( = .01). Seclusion may have a negative causal effect of patients' mental health status and should therefore be avoided in mental health care settings. Training efforts should raise the awareness of the medical staff about potential adverse effects instead of therapeutic benefits.

摘要

使用强制性手段,即违背个人意愿的干预措施,存在争议。最近的观察性研究强调了这些手段对患者心理健康可能产生的不利影响,但这一主题仍研究不足。本研究通过对观察性数据进行试验模拟,以进行因果推断,调查了一种常见的强制性手段——隔离(即被关在一个封闭的房间里)对心理健康的影响。我们使用了来自 1200 名精神科住院患者的数据,根据他们在住院期间是否被隔离进行分类。使用逆概率治疗加权来模拟对干预措施的随机分配。主要结局指标是国家健康结果量表(HoNOS)。次要结局指标是 HoNOS 的第一项,主要关注过度活跃、攻击性行为、破坏性行为或激动行为。这两个结局指标都是在出院时评估的。隔离有显著影响,HoNOS 总分增加( =.002),HoNOS 第一项增加( =.01)。因此,隔离可能对患者的心理健康状况产生负面影响,因此应在精神卫生保健环境中避免使用。培训工作应提高医务人员对潜在不良影响而非治疗益处的认识。