Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 10;13(1):4030. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31025-9.
Few studies have investigated the changes in patient state index (PSI) and bispectral index (BIS) in response to abrupt increase in electromyographic (EMG) activity. These were performed using intravenous anesthetics or reversal agents for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) other than sugammadex. We compared the changes in BIS and PSI values caused by the sugammadex reversal of NMB during steady-state sevoflurane anesthesia. We enrolled 50 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2. At the end of the surgery, we administered 2 mg kg sugammadex while maintaining sevoflurane for a 10-min study period. The changes in BIS and PSI from baseline (T) to train of four ratio of 90% were not significantly different (median difference 0; 95% CI - 3 to 2; P = 0.83), neither were the changes in BIS and PSI values from T to their maximum values (median difference 1; 95% CI - 1 to 4; P = 0.53). Maximum BIS and PSI were significantly higher than their baseline values (median difference 6; 95% CI 4-9; P < 0.001 and median difference 5; 95% CI 3-6; P < 0.001, respectively). We found weak positive correlations between BIS and BIS-EMG (r = 0.12, P = 0.01), as well as PSI and PSI-EMG (r = 0.25, P < 0.001). Both PSI and BIS were affected to some extent by EMG artifacts after sugammadex administration.
很少有研究调查在肌电图(EMG)活动突然增加时患者状态指数(PSI)和双频谱指数(BIS)的变化。这些研究是使用静脉内麻醉剂或除琥珀酸舒马曲坦以外的神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)逆转剂进行的。我们比较了在七氟醚麻醉稳态下使用琥珀酸舒马曲坦逆转 NMB 时 BIS 和 PSI 值的变化。我们招募了 50 名美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 1 级和 2 级的患者。在手术结束时,我们给予 2mg/kg 琥珀酸舒马曲坦,同时维持七氟醚 10 分钟进行研究。从基线(T)到四分之一比值为 90%的 BIS 和 PSI 的变化无显著差异(中位数差异 0;95%CI-3 至 2;P=0.83),从 T 到其最大值的 BIS 和 PSI 值变化也无显著差异(中位数差异 1;95%CI-1 至 4;P=0.53)。最大 BIS 和 PSI 值明显高于其基线值(中位数差异 6;95%CI4-9;P<0.001 和中位数差异 5;95%CI3-6;P<0.001,分别)。我们发现 BIS 与 BIS-EMG 之间存在弱正相关(r=0.12,P=0.01),PSI 与 PSI-EMG 之间也存在弱正相关(r=0.25,P<0.001)。在琥珀酸舒马曲坦给药后,PSI 和 BIS 均受到程度不同的肌电图伪影的影响。