Suppr超能文献

根据稳态全静脉麻醉下中度神经肌肉阻滞恢复情况比较脑电双频指数和患者状态指数值。

Comparison of Bispectral Index and Patient State Index values according to recovery from moderate neuromuscular block under steady-state total intravenous anesthesia.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam, Seoul, 06351, Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):5908. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85419-8.

Abstract

There were insufficient researches of the comparison between Bispectral Index (BIS) and Patient State Index (PSI) values during the recovery of moderate NMB. We investigated the response of these indices during neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal by sugammadex under steady-state total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using propofol/remifentanil. In this prospective, observational study, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled. At the end of surgery, after confirming that train-of-four (TOF) count as 1 or 2, we maintained a steady state (BIS value of 40-50). After administration of 2 mg kg sugammadex, BIS, PSI, and electromyography (EMG) signal values were recorded at one-minute intervals for 10 min. The primary outcome was the difference between the changes in BIS and PSI from baseline to a TOF ratio (TOFR) of 90 after sugammadex administration in steady-state TIVA. A total of 48 patients completed this trial. There was no significant difference between the changes in BIS and PSI values from baseline to TOFR 90 (- 0.333 ± 4.955 vs. - 0.188 ± 4.616; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.095 to 1.803; p = 0.882). Both BIS-EMG and PSI-EMG values at baseline and TOFR 90 were not statistically different (95% CI - 0.550 to 1.092; p = 0.510, 95% CI - 1.569 to 0.527; p = 0.322, respectively). No patient experienced any complications. Changes in BIS and PSI values after NMB reversal during steady-state TIVA were not significantly different. Both BIS and PSI provide trustworthy values for monitoring anesthetic depth during NMB reversal under TIVA.Trial Registration: This study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of Korea ( https://cris.nih.go.kr : KCT 0003805).

摘要

在中度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)恢复期间,关于脑电双频指数(BIS)和患者状态指数(PSI)值的比较研究还不够充分。我们在丙泊酚/瑞芬太尼靶控输注全身麻醉(TIVA)下,使用琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠研究了这些指数在神经肌肉阻滞逆转期间的反应。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。手术结束时,当确认四个成串刺激(TOF)计数为 1 或 2 时,我们维持稳态(BIS 值为 40-50)。给予 2mg/kg 琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠后,在 10 分钟内每隔 1 分钟记录 BIS、PSI 和肌电图(EMG)信号值。主要结局是在 TIVA 稳态下,给予琥珀酸舒更葡糖钠后从基线到 TOFR(90)的 BIS 和 PSI 变化之间的差异。共有 48 名患者完成了这项试验。从基线到 TOFR 90 的 BIS 和 PSI 值的变化没有统计学差异(-0.333±4.955 与-0.188±4.616;95%置信区间[CI]:-2.095 至 1.803;p=0.882)。基线和 TOFR 90 时的 BIS-EMG 和 PSI-EMG 值均无统计学差异(95%CI:-0.550 至 1.092;p=0.510,95%CI:-1.569 至 0.527;p=0.322)。没有患者发生任何并发症。在 TIVA 稳态下,NMB 逆转期间 BIS 和 PSI 值的变化无显著差异。在 TIVA 下的 NMB 逆转期间,BIS 和 PSI 均能提供可靠的麻醉深度监测值。

试验注册

该研究在韩国临床试验注册中心(https://cris.nih.go.kr:KCT 0003805)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24c9/7960721/ff0ea4c459a6/41598_2021_85419_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验