Kurz Deborah, Braig Stefanie, Genuneit Jon, Rothenbacher Dietrich
Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Helmholtzstrasse 22, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Pediatric Epidemiology, Clinic and Polyclinic for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Liebigstraße 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Mar 10;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00581-3.
Many authors have described a significant mental health burden on children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly moderated by social disparities. This analysis explores whether pre-pandemic family circumstances might be related to different aspects of child health during the pandemic.
We analyzed trajectories of health-related outcomes in children aged 5 to 9 years (T7 to T11) using the Ulm SPATZ Health study, a population based birth cohort study (baseline 04/2012-05/2013) conducted in the South of Germany. Outcomes were children's mental health, quality of life, and lifestyle, such as screen time and physical activity. We conducted descriptive statistics of maternal and child characteristics before and throughout the pandemic. We defined three different groups of pre-pandemic family situations and used adjusted mixed models to estimate differences in means associated with the time during the pandemic vs. before the pandemic in (a) all children and in (b) children belonging to specific pre-pandemic family situations.
We analyzed data from n = 588 children from whom at least one questionnaire was completed between T7 and T11. When not considering the pre-pandemic family situation, adjusted mixed models showed statistically significant lower mean scores of health-related quality of life among girls during vs. before the COVID-19 pandemic (difference in means (b): - 3.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): - 6.4, - 1.4). There were no substantial differences in mental health, screen time, or physical activity in boys or girls. When considering pre-pandemic family situations, boys with mothers having symptoms of depression or anxiety showed a substantial loss of health-related quality of life on the subscale of friends (b: - 10.5 (95% CI: - 19.7, - 1.4)). Among girls in this group, 60% of the 15 assessed outcomes were negatively associated with a remarkable loss in health-related quality of life (e.g., KINDL-physical well-being difference in means: - 12.2 (95% CI: - 18.9, - 5.4)). Furthermore, a substantial increase in screen time was found (+ 2.9 h (95% CI: 0.3, 5.6)).
Our results suggest that the health (and behavior) of primary school-aged children is possibly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with adverse consequences differing by gender and very likely by the pre-pandemic family situation. Especially in girls having a mother with depression or anxiety symptoms, the adverse consequences of the pandemic on mental health seem to be aggregated. Boys showed fewer adverse trajectories, and it needs to be further assessed which factors exactly are behind the (socio-economic) factors, such as maternal working habits and limited living space, when analyzing the effect of the pandemic on children's health.
许多作者描述了新冠疫情期间儿童和青少年承受的巨大心理健康负担,社会差异可能会对此起到缓和作用。本分析探讨了疫情前的家庭状况是否可能与疫情期间儿童健康的不同方面相关。
我们利用乌尔姆SPATZ健康研究分析了5至9岁儿童(T7至T11)与健康相关的结果轨迹,该研究是一项在德国南部开展的基于人群的出生队列研究(基线时间为2012年4月至2013年5月)。结果包括儿童的心理健康、生活质量和生活方式,如屏幕使用时间和体育活动。我们对疫情前及整个疫情期间的母婴特征进行了描述性统计。我们定义了三种不同的疫情前家庭状况组,并使用调整后的混合模型来估计在(a)所有儿童以及(b)属于特定疫情前家庭状况的儿童中,疫情期间与疫情前相比,均值的差异。
我们分析了n = 588名儿童的数据,这些儿童在T7至T11期间至少完成了一份问卷。在不考虑疫情前家庭状况的情况下,调整后的混合模型显示,与新冠疫情前相比,疫情期间女孩的健康相关生活质量平均得分在统计学上显著更低(均值差异(b):-3.9(95%置信区间(CI):-6.4,-1.4))。男孩和女孩在心理健康、屏幕使用时间或体育活动方面没有实质性差异。在考虑疫情前家庭状况时,母亲有抑郁或焦虑症状的男孩在朋友子量表上的健康相关生活质量大幅下降(b:-10.5(95%CI:-19.7,-1.4))。在该组女孩中,15项评估结果中有60%与健康相关生活质量的显著下降呈负相关(例如,儿童生活质量量表 - 身体健康维度的均值差异:-12.2(95%CI:-18.9,-5.4))。此外,还发现屏幕使用时间大幅增加(+2.9小时(95%CI:0.3,5.6))。
我们的结果表明,新冠疫情可能会影响小学适龄儿童的健康(和行为),其不良后果因性别而异,很可能也因疫情前的家庭状况而异。特别是对于母亲有抑郁或焦虑症状的女孩,疫情对心理健康的不良影响似乎更为集中。男孩表现出的不良轨迹较少,在分析疫情对儿童健康的影响时,需要进一步评估(社会经济)因素背后的确切因素,如母亲的工作习惯和居住空间有限等。