Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Centre for Sustainability and Wellbeing in the Visitor Economy, School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5):3874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053874.
At the destination level, destination branding may coexist with climate change communication. These two communication streams often overlap because they are both designed for large audiences. This poses a risk to the effectiveness of climate change communication and its ability to prompt a desired climate action. The viewpoint paper advocates the use of archetypal branding approach to ground and center climate change communication at a destination level while concurrently maintaining the uniqueness of destination branding. Three archetypes of destinations are distinguished: villains, victims, and heroes. Destinations should refrain from actions that would make them appear to be climate change villains. A balanced approach is further warranted when portraying destinations as victims. Lastly, destinations should aim at assuming the heroic archetypes by excelling in climate change mitigation. The basic mechanisms of the archetypal approach to destination branding are discussed alongside a framework that suggests areas for further practical investigation of climate change communication at a destination level.
在目的地层面,目的地品牌塑造可能与气候变化传播并存。这两个传播渠道通常会重叠,因为它们都是针对广大受众设计的。这给气候变化传播的有效性及其引发预期气候行动的能力带来了风险。本文观点主张采用典型的品牌塑造方法,在目的地层面上立足并集中气候变化传播,同时保持目的地品牌塑造的独特性。区分了三种类型的目的地:恶棍、受害者和英雄。目的地应避免采取使其成为气候变化恶棍的行动。在描绘受害者时,进一步需要采取平衡的方法。最后,目的地应该通过在气候变化缓解方面表现出色来努力成为英雄型目的地。讨论了目的地品牌塑造的典型方法的基本机制,并提出了一个框架,建议进一步在目的地层面上对气候变化传播进行实际调查。