Geriatric Medical Center, Excellent Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Aging and Aging Palliative Care Research Cluster, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):4020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054020.
This study evaluated the validity of the screening tools used to evaluate the frailty status of older Thai people. A cross-sectional study of 251 patients aged 60 years or more in an out-patient department was conducted using the Frailty Assessment Tool of the Thai Ministry of Public Health (FATMPH) and the Frail Non-Disabled (FiND) questionnaire, and the results were compared with Fried's Frailty Phenotype (FFP). The validity of the data acquired using each method was evaluated by examining their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Cohen's kappa coefficient. Most of the participants were female (60.96%), and most were between 60 and 69 years old (65.34%). The measured prevalences of frailty were 8.37%, 17.53%, and 3.98% using FFP, FATMPH, and FiND tools, respectively. FATMP had a sensitivity of 57.14%, a specificity of 86.09%, a PPV of 27.27%, and an NPV of 95.65%. FiND had a sensitivity of 19.05%, a specificity of 97.39%, a PPV of 40.00%, and an NPV of 92.94%. The results of the Cohen's kappa comparison of these two tools and FFP were 0.298 for FATMPH and 0.147 for FiND. The predictive values of both FATMPH and FiND were insufficient for assessing frailty in a clinical setting. Additional research on other frailty tools is necessary to improve the accuracy of frailty screening in the older population of Thailand.
本研究评估了用于评估泰国老年人虚弱状态的筛查工具的有效性。采用横断面研究方法,对 251 名 60 岁及以上的门诊患者使用泰国公共卫生部的虚弱评估工具(FATMPH)和虚弱非残疾(FiND)问卷进行评估,并将结果与 Fried 的虚弱表型(FFP)进行比较。通过检查每种方法获得的数据的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 Cohen's kappa 系数来评估数据的有效性。大多数参与者为女性(60.96%),大多数年龄在 60-69 岁之间(65.34%)。使用 FFP、FATMPH 和 FiND 工具分别测量的虚弱患病率分别为 8.37%、17.53%和 3.98%。FATMP 的灵敏度为 57.14%,特异性为 86.09%,PPV 为 27.27%,NPV 为 95.65%。FiND 的灵敏度为 19.05%,特异性为 97.39%,PPV 为 40.00%,NPV 为 92.94%。这两种工具与 FFP 的 Cohen's kappa 比较结果分别为 FATMPH 为 0.298,FiND 为 0.147。FATMPH 和 FiND 的预测值在临床环境中评估虚弱都不够充分。需要对其他虚弱工具进行更多研究,以提高泰国老年人群中虚弱筛查的准确性。