Departament Infermeria, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08195 Barcelona, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054095.
Educational efficiency is the predetermining factor for increasing the survival rate of patients with cardiac arrest. Virtual reality (VR) simulation could help to improve the skills of those undergoing basic life support-automated external defibrillation (BLS-AED) training. Our purpose was to evaluate whether BLS-AED with virtual reality improves the skills and satisfaction of students enrolled in in-person training after completing the course and their retention of those skills 6 months later. This was an experimental study of first-year university students from a school of health sciences. We compared traditional training (control group-CG) with virtual reality simulation (experimental group-EG). The students were evaluated using a simulated case with three validated instruments after the completion of training and at 6 months. A total of 241 students participated in the study. After the training period, there were no statistically significant differences in knowledge evaluation or in practical skills when assessed using a feedback mannequin. Statistically significant results on defibrillation were poorer in the EG evaluated by the instructor. Retention at 6 months decreased significantly in both groups. The results of the teaching methodology using VR were similar to those obtained through traditional methodology: there was an increase in skills after training, and their retention decreased over time. Defibrillation results were better after traditional learning.
教育效率是提高心脏骤停患者存活率的决定因素。虚拟现实 (VR) 模拟可以帮助提高接受基本生命支持-自动体外除颤器 (BLS-AED) 培训的人员的技能。我们的目的是评估在完成课程后,虚拟现实的 BLS-AED 是否会提高参加现场培训的学生的技能和满意度,以及他们在 6 个月后的技能保留情况。这是一项针对健康科学学校一年级大学生的实验研究。我们将传统培训(对照组-CG)与虚拟现实模拟(实验组-EG)进行了比较。学生在培训结束后和 6 个月后使用三个经过验证的仪器评估了模拟案例。共有 241 名学生参加了这项研究。培训期结束后,使用反馈模型评估时,知识评估或实际技能评估均无统计学差异。评估员评估的 EG 在心电除颤方面的统计学结果较差。两组的 6 个月保留率均显著下降。使用 VR 的教学方法的结果与传统方法相似:培训后技能有所提高,随着时间的推移,技能保留率下降。传统学习后的除颤效果更好。