Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 6;20(5):4634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054634.
The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of maxillary arch transverse expansion using the Invisalign clear aligner system without auxiliaries other than Invisalign attachments. Knowing the accuracy of a movement through a clear aligner system allows the clinician to plan the treatment with greater precision and to achieve the expected result faster. The study group included 28 patients with a mean age of 17 ± 3.2 years. The treatment protocol for all the selected patients included the application of the Invisalign clear aligner system without auxiliaries, except for the Invisalign attachments; in no case were tooth extraction or interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) performed. Linear measurements of the expansion were assessed before treatment (T0), at the end of treatment (T1), and on final virtual models by ClinCheck (TC). A paired -test was used to compare T0-T1 and T1-TC differences. A paired -test was applied, and one normality was validated with the Shapiro-Wilks test. If normality was not met, the nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney U test) was applied. The level of significance was set at 5%. Statistically significant differences were found for all measurements at T0-T1. The results showed an average accuracy of efficacy of 70.88%. The differences in predictability between the various vestibular measurements (intercanine, inter-premolar, and intermolar) were not statistically significant, while they were for gingival measurements. The overall accuracy of the expansion treatment was 70%, regardless of tooth type.
本研究旨在评估无辅助装置的 Invisalign 隐形矫正器系统对上颌骨横向扩展的疗效和准确性。了解通过隐形矫正器系统的运动准确性可以使临床医生更精确地计划治疗,并更快地达到预期的效果。研究组包括 28 名平均年龄为 17 ± 3.2 岁的患者。所有入选患者的治疗方案均包括应用 Invisalign 隐形矫正器系统,除了 Invisalign 附件,没有进行拔牙或邻面去釉(IPR)。在治疗前(T0)、治疗结束时(T1)和最终的 ClinCheck 虚拟模型(TC)上评估了扩展的线性测量值。使用配对 t 检验比较 T0-T1 和 T1-TC 差异。应用配对 t 检验,并通过 Shapiro-Wilks 检验验证正态性。如果不符合正态性,则应用非参数检验(Mann-Whitney U 检验)。显著性水平设定为 5%。在 T0-T1 时所有测量值均有统计学差异。结果显示,疗效的平均准确性为 70.88%。不同前庭测量值(犬齿间、前磨牙间和磨牙间)之间的可预测性差异无统计学意义,而牙龈测量值则有统计学意义。无论牙齿类型如何,扩展治疗的总体准确性为 70%。