Martin Iglesias Maria Aranzazu, Garcia Rodriguez Rosa, Palacios Cañas Alberto, Meneses Sotomayor Jaime Vinicio, Clar Castello Miriam, Feo Brito Francisco
Allergy Department, General University Hospital of Ciudad Real, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 24;12(5):1823. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051823.
SLIT for the treatment of plant food allergies has been demonstrated to be safe but less effective than OIT, but the latter is associated with more adverse reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new protocol starting with SLIT-peach followed by OIT with commercial peach juice in patients with LTP syndrome.
This was a prospective, noncontrolled, open study on patients with LTP syndrome who are not sensitized to storage proteins. SLIT peach ALK was followed by OIT with Granini peach juice after 40 days of the SLIT maintenance phase. At home, the Granini juice dose was progressively increased during the 42 days until reaching 200 ml. After achieving the maximum dose, an open oral food challenge was carried out with the food that had caused the most severe reaction. If negative, the patient was instructed to progressively introduce the foods that were avoided before starting immunotherapy at home. Patients were reviewed 1 month later. The quality-of-life questionnaire FAQLQ-AF was completed at the beginning of the study and one month after the final challenge.
Forty-five patients were included, most of them with LTP anaphylaxis. Peach SLIT was well tolerated in 80.5%, and OIT with Granini was well tolerated in 85%, with no severe adverse reactions. The final provocation was successful in 39/45 (86.6%). One month after the final provocation, 42/45 (93.3%) patients had no dietary restrictions. FAQLA-AF was significantly reduced.
This combination of peach SLIT and OIT with commercial peach juice provides a new, fast, effective, and safe immunotherapy option for selected patients with LTP syndrome who are not allergic to storage proteins, improving their quality of life. This study suggests that cross-desensitization relative to the nsLTPs of several plant foods can be achieved by using Prup3.
已证明舌下免疫治疗(SLIT)用于治疗植物性食物过敏是安全的,但效果不如口服免疫治疗(OIT),而后者会引发更多不良反应。本研究的目的是评估一种新方案的疗效和安全性,该方案先进行桃的SLIT治疗,随后对患有脂质转移蛋白(LTP)综合征的患者使用市售桃汁进行OIT治疗。
这是一项针对对储存蛋白不敏感的LTP综合征患者的前瞻性、非对照、开放性研究。在SLIT维持期40天后,先用ALK桃SLIT治疗,然后用格拉尼尼(Granini)桃汁进行OIT治疗。在家中,格拉尼尼果汁的剂量在42天内逐渐增加,直至达到200毫升。达到最大剂量后,对引起最严重反应的食物进行开放性口服食物激发试验。如果结果为阴性,则指导患者在家中逐步引入免疫治疗开始前避免食用的食物。1个月后对患者进行复查。在研究开始时和最后一次激发试验1个月后完成生活质量问卷FAQLQ - AF。
纳入45例患者,大多数为LTP过敏反应患者。80.5%的患者对桃SLIT耐受性良好,85%的患者对格拉尼尼OIT耐受性良好,未出现严重不良反应。最终激发试验在39/45(86.6%)的患者中成功。在最后一次激发试验1个月后,42/45(93.3%)的患者没有饮食限制。FAQLA - AF显著降低。
桃SLIT与市售桃汁OIT的这种联合为对储存蛋白不过敏的特定LTP综合征患者提供了一种新的、快速、有效且安全的免疫治疗选择,改善了他们的生活质量。本研究表明,使用Prup3可以实现对几种植物性食物的非特异性脂质转移蛋白(nsLTPs)的交叉脱敏。