Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, 13 Children's Way, Slot 512-13, Little Rock, AR, 72202, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018 Oct;55(2):139-152. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8677-0.
Development of active therapies for IgE-mediated food allergy is a critical action step toward alleviating the adverse medical, psychosocial, and economic burdens on affected patients and families. Significant progress has been observed specifically in the application of single-allergen oral and sublingual immunotherapy for treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy, with emphasis on milk, egg, and peanut as the primary allergens. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has demonstrated efficacy in promoting immunomodulatory effects that lead to the clinical outcome of desensitization, defined as reduced reactivity while on active OIT, in the majority of treated individuals; however, achievement of sustained unresponsiveness following cessation of therapy has been observed in a smaller subset of treated subjects. The potential therapeutic benefits of OIT must be carefully considered in light of the significant potential for adverse events ranging from self-limited or easily treated oropharyngeal, respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms, to persistent abdominal complaints that lead to cessation of therapy in an estimated 10-15% of treated individuals. To date, the majority of studies have focused on single-allergen OIT approaches; however, multi-allergen OIT has shown promise in initial trials and is the subject of ongoing investigation to address the complex needs of multi-food allergic individuals. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been utilized for the treatment of food allergy and pollen-food allergy syndrome, demonstrating moderate efficacy, a favorable safety profile and variable tolerability, with oropharyngeal symptoms most commonly observed. Although studies directly comparing OIT and SLIT are limited, in general, the favorable safety profile associated with SLIT comes at the expense of reduced efficacy, while the more robust clinical effects observed with OIT come at the risk of potentially intolerable, treatment-limiting side effects. Future investigation to address specific knowledge gaps including optimal dose, duration, age of initiation, maintenance schedule, mechanisms, predictors of risk and therapeutic response will be important to maximize efficacy, minimize risk and develop personalized, effective approaches to targeting food allergy.
开发针对 IgE 介导的食物过敏的主动疗法是减轻受影响患者及其家庭的不良医疗、心理社会和经济负担的关键步骤。在应用单一过敏原口服和舌下免疫疗法治疗 IgE 介导的食物过敏方面取得了重大进展,重点是牛奶、鸡蛋和花生作为主要过敏原。口服免疫疗法 (OIT) 已被证明具有促进免疫调节作用的功效,从而导致脱敏的临床结果,即在大多数接受治疗的个体中,在积极进行 OIT 的同时反应性降低;然而,在一小部分接受治疗的个体中观察到治疗停止后持续无反应。必须仔细考虑 OIT 的潜在治疗益处,因为它存在严重的不良反应风险,从自限性或易于治疗的口咽、呼吸或胃肠道症状到持续的腹部不适,导致约 10-15%的接受治疗的个体停止治疗。迄今为止,大多数研究都集中在单一过敏原 OIT 方法上;然而,多过敏原 OIT 在初步试验中显示出前景,并正在进行研究以解决多食物过敏个体的复杂需求。舌下免疫疗法 (SLIT) 已被用于治疗食物过敏和花粉-食物过敏综合征,显示出中等疗效、良好的安全性和可变的耐受性,最常见的是口咽症状。虽然直接比较 OIT 和 SLIT 的研究有限,但一般来说,SLIT 与良好的安全性相关,但疗效降低,而 OIT 观察到的更强大的临床效果则存在潜在不可耐受、治疗受限的副作用风险。未来的研究将解决包括最佳剂量、持续时间、起始年龄、维持方案、机制、风险预测因素和治疗反应在内的特定知识空白,对于最大限度地提高疗效、最小化风险以及开发针对食物过敏的个性化、有效的方法非常重要。