• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《被束缚:1986年美国的心理健康与法律》

Belegaled: mental health and the law in the United States, 1986.

作者信息

Rappeport J R

机构信息

Medical Service of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 1987 Nov;32(8):719-27. doi: 10.1177/070674378703200817.

DOI:10.1177/070674378703200817
PMID:3690489
Abstract

Kenneth Gray, an attorney as well as a psychiatrist, was the leader in the development of law and psychiatry in Canada prior to his death in 1970. He lived during the post WWII years which saw a phenomenal growth of psychiatry as well as the beginnings of the modern era of a renewed concern for human rights. This later concern has caused the belegalment of many areas of psychiatric practice. Kenneth Gray would have to learn a new set of rules for commitment, the use of ECT and informed consent. He would discover that a patient has a right to treatment that must be buttressed by an individual treatment plan. He would discover that a committed patient has a right to refuse treatment and that some courts in the United States have said that anti-psychotic medications are mind-altering and thus an invasion of the patients 1st amendment rights. He would see untreated refusing patients languishing in the hospital or the homeless mentally ill on the streets because of restrictive commitment laws. As an attorney he would also be concerned about the proposed solution to the homeless, outpatient commitment. He certainly would have been impressed with some of the recent decisions in the United States on our duty to warn or protect known and unknown victims. Seeing patients' advocates on the hospital wards would be a real surprise to him. These controls on the practice of psychiatry for the protection of our patients cut both ways. Dr. Gray's medical/legal education would be tested to its full.

摘要

肯尼斯·格雷既是一名律师,也是一名精神科医生,在1970年去世前,他是加拿大法律与精神病学发展领域的领军人物。他生活在二战后的年代,当时精神病学取得了显著发展,同时人权重新受到关注的现代时代也初露端倪。后来这种关注导致了精神病学实践许多领域的法律化。肯尼斯·格雷将不得不学习一套关于非自愿住院、电休克治疗的使用以及知情同意的新规则。他会发现患者有权接受必须由个人治疗计划支持的治疗。他会发现非自愿住院的患者有权拒绝治疗,而且美国的一些法院表示,抗精神病药物会改变心智,因此侵犯了患者的第一修正案权利。他会看到因限制性非自愿住院法律而拒绝治疗的患者在医院里日益衰弱,或者看到街头无家可归的精神病患者。作为一名律师,他也会关注针对无家可归者提出的解决方案——门诊非自愿住院。他肯定会对美国最近一些关于我们有责任警告或保护已知和未知受害者的判决印象深刻。看到医院病房里有患者权益倡导者对他来说会是一个真正的惊喜。这些为保护患者而对精神病学实践进行的管控是双刃剑。格雷医生的医学/法律教育将受到全面考验。

相似文献

1
Belegaled: mental health and the law in the United States, 1986.《被束缚:1986年美国的心理健康与法律》
Can J Psychiatry. 1987 Nov;32(8):719-27. doi: 10.1177/070674378703200817.
2
The APA model law and three legal issues in mental health.《美国心理学会》示范法与心理健康领域的三个法律问题。
Health Soc Work. 1987 Fall;12(4):259-66. doi: 10.1093/hsw/12.4.259.
3
Law, psychiatry and rights.
Med Law. 1991;10(4):327-33.
4
[Normative and legal procedure prerequisites in the commitment of psychiatric patients in relation to Paragraph 6 of the Commitment Law of East Germany].[东德《收容法》第6条中精神科患者收容的规范及法律程序前提条件]
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1984 Aug;36(8):489-95.
5
[Current legal developments and psychiatric practice].
Nervenarzt. 1984 Nov;55(11):565-73.
6
Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.美国最高法院对两起案件的裁决扩大了对患有精神疾病的刑事被告的法律保护。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Jul;43(7):752-3.
7
Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1980 Jun;31(6):385-96. doi: 10.1176/ps.31.6.385.
8
Needed changes in law and procedure for the chronically mentally ill.针对慢性精神病患者所需的法律和程序变革。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1986 May;37(5):475-80. doi: 10.1176/ps.37.5.475.
9
Mental health law: an idea whose time has passed.精神卫生法:一个已过时的理念。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;28(4):560-5. doi: 10.1080/00048679409080779.
10
Rights of the patient vs. rights of the public in the "Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law--1991".1991年《精神疾病治疗法》中患者权利与公众权利之比较
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1995;32(2):94-101.