Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查前成人患者 16 种肠道准备方案的清洁效果和耐受性的网状 Meta 分析。

Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceuticals, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China.

Pharmacy Department of Chinese PLA No. 463 Hospital, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 11;38(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04355-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Before a colonoscopy, an adequate bowel preparation (BP) is required. Currently, more novel regimens with different effects have been proposed and used successively. This network meta-analysis aims to compare the cleaning effects and patients' tolerability of several BP regimens.

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including sixteen kinds of BP regimens. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The outcomes of this study were bowel cleansing effect and tolerance.

RESULTS

We included a total of 40 articles with 13,064 patients. For the primary outcomes, polyethylene glycol (PEG) + ascorbic acid (Asc) + simethicone (Sim) (OR, 14.27, 95%CrI, 2.68-127.87) regimen is ranked first in Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). PEG + Sim (OR, 2.0, 95%CrI 0.64-6.4) regimen is ranked first in Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale (OBPS), but without significant differences. For the secondary outcomes, PEG + Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate (SP/MC) (OR, 4.88e + 11, 95%CrI, 39.56-1.82e + 35) regimen is the best in cecal intubation rate(CIR). PEG + Sim (OR,1.5, 95%CrI, 1.0-2.2) regimen is ranked first in adenoma detection rate(ADR). Senna (OR, 3.23, 95%CrI, 1.04-9.97) and SP/MC (OR, 249.91, 95%CrI, 78.49-958.19) regimens are ranked first in abdominal pain and willingness to repeat, respectively. There is no significant difference in cecal intubation time (CIT), polyp detection rate (PDR), nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloat.

CONCLUSION

PEG + Asc + Sim regimen is more effective at cleaning the bowel. PEG + SP/MC will be helpful to increase CIR. For ADR, PEG + Sim regimen will be more helpful. In addition, PEG + Asc + Sim is the least likely to cause abdominal bloat, while Senna regimen is more likely to cause abdominal pain. Patients prefer to re-use the SP/MC regimen for bowel preparation.

摘要

目的

结肠镜检查是结直肠癌(CRC)诊断的金标准。结肠镜检查前需要进行充分的肠道准备(BP)。目前,已经提出并相继使用了更多具有不同效果的新方案。本网络荟萃分析旨在比较几种 BP 方案的清洁效果和患者耐受性。

方法

我们对包括 16 种 BP 方案的随机对照试验进行了网络荟萃分析。我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库。本研究的结局为肠道清洁效果和耐受性。

结果

我们共纳入了 40 项研究,共计 13064 名患者。对于主要结局,聚乙二醇(PEG)+抗坏血酸(Asc)+二甲硅油(Sim)(OR,14.27,95%CrI,2.68-127.87)方案在波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)中排名第一。PEG+Sim(OR,2.0,95%CrI 0.64-6.4)方案在渥太华肠道准备量表(OBPS)中排名第一,但无显著差异。对于次要结局,PEG+聚乙二醇钠/硫酸镁(SP/MC)(OR,4.88e+11,95%CrI,39.56-1.82e+35)方案在盲肠插管率(CIR)方面效果最佳。PEG+Sim(OR,1.5,95%CrI,1.0-2.2)方案在腺瘤检出率(ADR)方面排名第一。番泻叶(OR,3.23,95%CrI,1.04-9.97)和 SP/MC(OR,249.91,95%CrI,78.49-958.19)方案在腹痛和重复意愿方面排名第一。盲肠插管时间(CIT)、息肉检出率(PDR)、恶心、呕吐和腹胀方面无显著差异。

结论

PEG+Asc+Sim 方案在清洁肠道方面更有效。PEG+SP/MC 有助于增加 CIR。对于 ADR,PEG+Sim 方案更有帮助。此外,PEG+Asc+Sim 引起腹胀的可能性最小,而番泻叶引起腹痛的可能性最大。患者更愿意重复使用 SP/MC 方案进行肠道准备。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验