• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较磷酸钠片(Quicklean)和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶试剂盒肠道清洁效果的非劣效性临床试验。

Noninferiority clinical trial comparing the bowel cleansing efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean) with a polyethylene glycol/bisacodyl kit.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Acupuncture Science, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 7;27(5):428-441. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i5.428.

DOI:10.3748/wjg.v27.i5.428
PMID:33584074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7856840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efficient bowel cleansing is essential for a successful colonoscopy, but the ideal cleansing agent, volume, and pharmaceutical dosage form have yet to be determined. Small-volume cleansers enhance patient compliance.

AIM

To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of 32-tablet sodium phosphate (Quiklean) with 2-L polyethylene glycol (PEG)/bisacodyl (Klean-Prep/ Dulcolax) under identical dietary recommendations.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, noninferiority clinical trial enrolled 472 outpatients, randomized 456 subjects, and scheduled 442 subjects to undergo colonoscopy (Quiklean = 222 and Klean-Prep/Dulcolax = 220). After bowel preparation, a colonoscopist performed the colonoscopy with video recorded for rating. The primary efficacy endpoint was the bowel cleansing quality using the Aronchick Scale. The secondary endpoints were the bowel cleansing efficacy of three colon segments, tolerability and acceptability, safety using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale, questionnaires by subjects, and monitoring of adverse events.

RESULTS

Success rates (Excellent + Good) of the bowel cleansing quality by Aronchick Scale were 98.6% ( = 205) and 97.6% ( = 204) in the Quiklean and Klean-Prep/Dulcolax groups, respectively. Quiklean demonstrated noninferiority over Klean-Prep/Dulcolax in colon cleansing efficacy. Quicken showed better tolerability and acceptability in the overall experience (was rated as excellent; 24.0% 17.2%; = 0.0016) and the taste of the study preparation (was rated as excellent, 23.1% 13.4%; < 0.0001) than Klean-Prep/Dulcolax. Safety profiles did not differ between the two groups. Our data indicate that Quiklean is an adequate, well-tolerated bowel cleansing preparation compared with the standard comparator Klean-Prep/Dulcolax.

CONCLUSION

Quiklean is sodium phosphate tablets available on Taiwan's market for bowel preparation; it potentially offers patients an alternative to standard large-volume bowel preparation regimens and may, therefore, increase positive attitudes toward colonoscopies and participation rates.

摘要

背景

高效的肠道清洁对于成功进行结肠镜检查至关重要,但理想的清洁剂、容量和药物剂型尚未确定。小容量清洁剂可提高患者的依从性。

目的

比较 32 片装磷酸钠(Quiklean)与 2 升聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(Klean-Prep/Dulcolax)在相同饮食建议下的肠道清洁效果。

方法

这是一项多中心、随机、平行组、非劣效性临床试验,共纳入 472 名门诊患者,随机分组 456 例,计划 442 例接受结肠镜检查(Quiklean = 222 例,Klean-Prep/Dulcolax = 220 例)。肠道准备后,由结肠镜检查医师进行视频记录评分的结肠镜检查。主要疗效终点是使用 Aronchick 量表评估的肠道清洁质量。次要终点是三个结肠段的肠道清洁效果、耐受性和可接受性、使用渥太华肠道准备量表评估的安全性、患者问卷和不良事件监测。

结果

Aronchick 量表评估的肠道清洁质量成功率(优秀+良好)分别为 Quiklean 组 98.6%(=205 例)和 Klean-Prep/Dulcolax 组 97.6%(=204 例)。Quiklean 在结肠清洁效果方面表现出非劣效性优于 Klean-Prep/Dulcolax。Quiklean 在整体体验(评为优秀;24.0% 17.2%;=0.0016)和研究准备的口感(评为优秀;23.1% 13.4%;<0.0001)方面表现出更好的耐受性和可接受性,优于 Klean-Prep/Dulcolax。两组安全性特征无差异。我们的数据表明,与标准对照 Klean-Prep/Dulcolax 相比,Quiklean 是一种充分、耐受良好的肠道清洁准备药物。

结论

Quiklean 是台湾市场上可用于肠道准备的磷酸钠片剂,它为患者提供了一种替代标准大容量肠道准备方案的选择,因此可能会提高对结肠镜检查的积极态度和参与率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1bd/7856840/e4ee75c0c483/WJG-27-428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1bd/7856840/e4ee75c0c483/WJG-27-428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1bd/7856840/e4ee75c0c483/WJG-27-428-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Noninferiority clinical trial comparing the bowel cleansing efficacy of sodium phosphate tablets (Quiklean) with a polyethylene glycol/bisacodyl kit.比较磷酸钠片(Quicklean)和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶试剂盒肠道清洁效果的非劣效性临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 7;27(5):428-441. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i5.428.
2
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).一项比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(The Bowklean 研究)肠道清洁效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62120-w.
3
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
4
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
5
Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15845-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845.
6
Split-dose administration of a dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser for colonoscopy: the SEE CLEAR I study.分剂量给予双重作用、低容量肠道清洁剂用于结肠镜检查:SEE CLEAR I 研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
7
2-Litre polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone plus bisacodyl versus 4-litre polyethylene glycol as preparation for colonoscopy in chronic constipation.2升聚乙二醇-柠檬酸盐-西甲硅油加比沙可啶与4升聚乙二醇用于慢性便秘患者结肠镜检查前的肠道准备比较
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Oct;47(10):857-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
8
A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*).一项比较三种用于结肠镜检查的肠道清洁溶液(HSG - 01*)安全性和有效性的随机、双盲、前瞻性试验。
Endoscopy. 2003 Apr;35(4):300-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38150.
9
Bisacodyl plus split 2-L polyethylene glycol-citrate-simethicone improves quality of bowel preparation before screening colonoscopy.比沙可啶加 2-L 聚乙二醇柠檬酸盐-二甲硅油散可改善筛查性结肠镜检查前的肠道准备质量。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Sep 7;19(33):5493-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5493.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of enhanced bowel preparation on complications and prognosis following colonoscopic polypectomy.强化肠道准备对结肠镜下息肉切除术后并发症及预后的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jun 27;17(6):106264. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i6.106264.
2
Cleaning effect and tolerance of 16 bowel preparation regimens on adult patients before colonoscopy: a network meta-analysis.结肠镜检查前成人患者 16 种肠道准备方案的清洁效果和耐受性的网状 Meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Mar 11;38(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04355-3.

本文引用的文献

1
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Bowel Cleansing Efficacy of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate and Polyethylene Glycol/Bisacodyl (The Bowklean Study).一项比较匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁和聚乙二醇/比沙可啶(The Bowklean 研究)肠道清洁效果的随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 27;10(1):5604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62120-w.
2
Update on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查肠道准备的最新进展
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;16(1):165-181. doi: 10.1007/s11938-018-0165-3.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).
在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
4
Electrophysiology of Hypokalemia and Hyperkalemia.低钾血症和高钾血症的电生理学
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;10(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004667.
5
Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization.优化结肠镜检查的肠道准备:提高可视化质量指南
Ann Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr-Jun;29(2):137-46. doi: 10.20524/aog.2016.0005.
6
Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于结肠镜检查肠道准备的随机对照试验
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15845-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15845.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing in healthy Korean adults.磷酸钠片与聚乙二醇溶液用于韩国健康成年人肠道准备的疗效及安全性比较
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Nov;55(6):1542-55. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1542.
8
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.优化结肠镜检查肠道准备的充分性:美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组的建议
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct;80(4):543-562. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.002.
9
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using standard vs reduced doses of sodium phosphate: A single-blind randomized controlled study.使用标准剂量与减少剂量的磷酸钠进行结肠镜检查的肠道准备:一项单盲随机对照研究。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug 16;6(8):379-84. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i8.379.
10
Low-volume polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: a meta-analysis.低容量聚乙二醇和比沙可啶用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的荟萃分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(4):319-324.