Department of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Oncology Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Regina Elena", Rome, Italy.
Oncologist. 2023 Apr 6;28(4):e205-e211. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad043.
Monotherapy immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) used in second- or later-line settings has been reported to induce hyperprogression. This study evaluated hyperprogression risk with ICI (atezolizumab) in the first-, second-, or later-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and provides insights into hyperprogression risk with contemporary first-line ICI treatment.
Hyperprogression was identified using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)-based criteria in a dataset of pooled individual-participant level data from BIRCH, FIR, IMpower130, IMpower131, IMpower150, OAK, and POPLAR trials. Odds ratios were computed to compare hyperprogression risks between groups. Landmark Cox proportional-hazard regression was used to evaluate the association between hyperprogression and progression-free survival/overall survival. Secondarily, putative risk factors for hyperprogression among second- or later-line atezolizumab-treated patients were evaluated using univariate logistic regression models.
Of the included 4644 patients, 119 of the atezolizumab-treated patients (n = 3129) experienced hyperprogression. Hyperprogression risk was markedly lower with first-line atezolizumab-either chemoimmunotherapy or monotherapy-compared to second/later-line atezolizumab monotherapy (0.7% vs. 8.8%, OR = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.04-0.13). Further, there was no statistically significant difference in hyperprogression risk with first-line atezolizumab-chemoimmunotherapy versus chemotherapy alone (0.6% vs. 1.0%, OR = 0.55, 95% CI, 0.22-1.36). Sensitivity analyses using an extended RECIST-based criteria including early death supported these findings. Hyperprogression was associated with worsened overall survival (HR = 3.4, 95% CI, 2.7-4.2, P < .001); elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was the strongest risk factor for hyperprogression (C-statistic = 0.62, P < .001).
This study presents first evidence for a markedly lower hyperprogression risk in advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line ICI, particularly with chemoimmunotherapy, as compared to second- or later-line ICI treatment.
在二线或后线治疗环境中使用单药免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已报告可诱导超进展。本研究评估了在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线、二线或后线治疗中使用 ICI(阿替利珠单抗)的超进展风险,并提供了关于当代一线 ICI 治疗中超进展风险的见解。
使用来自 BIRCH、FIR、IMpower130、IMpower131、IMpower150、OAK 和 POPLAR 试验的汇总个体参与者水平数据集中的基于 RECIST 的标准,通过数据集识别超进展。计算比值比以比较各组之间的超进展风险。使用 landmark Cox 比例风险回归来评估超进展与无进展生存期/总生存期之间的关联。其次,使用单变量逻辑回归模型评估二线或后线阿替利珠单抗治疗患者中超进展的潜在危险因素。
在纳入的 4644 名患者中,119 名阿替利珠单抗治疗患者(n=3129)经历了超进展。与二线/后线阿替利珠单抗单药治疗相比,一线阿替利珠单抗(无论是化疗免疫治疗还是单药治疗)的超进展风险明显较低(0.7%比 8.8%,OR=0.07,95%CI,0.04-0.13)。此外,一线阿替利珠单抗-化疗免疫治疗与单纯化疗相比,超进展风险无统计学差异(0.6%比 1.0%,OR=0.55,95%CI,0.22-1.36)。使用包括早期死亡的扩展基于 RECIST 的标准进行的敏感性分析支持这些发现。超进展与总生存期恶化相关(HR=3.4,95%CI,2.7-4.2,P<.001);升高的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值是超进展的最强危险因素(C 统计量=0.62,P<.001)。
本研究首次提供了证据,表明在晚期 NSCLC 患者中,与二线或后线 ICI 治疗相比,一线 ICI 治疗,特别是化疗免疫治疗,可显著降低超进展风险。