Thoracic Oncology Program, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jul;20(7):924-937. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30167-6. Epub 2019 May 20.
Atezolizumab (a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1), which restores anticancer immunity, improved overall survival in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer and also showed clinical benefit when combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. IMpower130 aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line therapy for non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
IMpower130 was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done in 131 centres across eight countries (the USA, Canada, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Israel). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, and had histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and received no previous chemotherapy for stage IV disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1; permuted block [block size of six] with an interactive voice or web response system) to receive atezolizumab (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus chemotherapy (carboplatin [area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min every 3 weeks] plus nab-paclitaxel [100 mg/m intravenously every week]) or chemotherapy alone for four or six 21-day cycles followed by maintenance therapy. Stratification factors were sex, baseline liver metastases, and PD-L1 tumour expression. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat wild-type (ie, EGFR and ALK) population. The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02367781.
Between April 16, 2015, and Feb 13, 2017, 724 patients were randomly assigned and 723 were included in the intention-to-treat population (one patient died before randomisation, but was assigned to a treatment group; this patient was excluded from the intention-to-treat population) of the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group (483 patients in the intention-to-treat population and 451 patients in the intention-to-treat wild-type population) or the chemotherapy group (240 patients in the intention-to-treat population and 228 patients in the intention-to-treat wild-type population). Median follow-up in the intention-to-treat wild-type population was similar between groups (18·5 months [IQR 15·2-23·6] in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 19·2 months [15·4-23·0] in the chemotherapy group). In the intention-to-treat wild-type population, there were significant improvements in median overall survival (18·6 months [95% CI 16·0-21·2] in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 13·9 months [12·0-18·7] in the chemotherapy group; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·79 [95% CI 0·64-0·98]; p=0·033) and median progression-free survival (7·0 months [95% CI 6·2-7·3] in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 5·5 months [4·4-5·9] in the chemotherapy group; stratified HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·54-0·77]; p<0·0001]). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (152 [32%] of 473 in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 65 [28%] of 232 in the chemotherapy group), anaemia (138 [29%] vs 47 [20%]), and decreased neutrophil count (57 [12%] vs 19 [8%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 112 (24%) of 473 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and 30 (13%) of 232 patients in the chemotherapy group. Treatment-related (any treatment) deaths occurred in eight (2%) of 473 patients in the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group and one (<1%) of 232 patients in the chemotherapy group.
IMpower130 showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival and a significant improvement in progression-free survival with atezolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer and no ALK or EGFR mutations. No new safety signals were identified. This study supports the benefit of atezolizumab, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy, as first-line treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche.
阿特珠单抗(一种针对 PD-L1 的单克隆抗体)可恢复抗癌免疫,在先前接受治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中提高了总生存率,并且在与化疗联合作为非小细胞肺癌一线治疗时也显示出了临床获益。IMpower130 旨在评估阿特珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性。
IMpower130 是一项在 8 个国家(美国、加拿大、比利时、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和以色列)的 131 个中心进行的多中心、随机、开放标签、3 期研究。纳入的患者年龄为 18 岁或以上,组织学或细胞学证实为 IV 期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为 0 或 1,并且没有接受过 IV 期疾病的化疗。患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配(通过交互式语音或网络响应系统进行排列块[块大小为 6]),接受阿特珠单抗(每 3 周静脉注射 1200mg)联合化疗(每 3 周静脉注射卡铂[曲线下面积 6mg/mL 每 min]加 nab-紫杉醇[100mg/m 静脉注射每周])或单纯化疗 4 或 6 个 21 天周期,随后进行维持治疗。分层因素为性别、基线肝转移和 PD-L1 肿瘤表达。主要共同终点为研究者评估的无进展生存期和野生型(即 EGFR 和 ALK)人群的总生存期。安全性人群包括至少接受一剂研究药物的患者。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02367781。
2015 年 4 月 16 日至 2017 年 2 月 13 日,724 名患者被随机分配,723 名患者被纳入意向治疗的野生型(即 EGFR 和 ALK)人群(一名患者在随机分组前死亡,但被分配到治疗组;这名患者被排除在意向治疗人群之外)的阿特珠单抗联合化疗组(483 名患者在意向治疗人群和 451 名患者在野生型人群)或化疗组(240 名患者在意向治疗人群和 228 名患者在野生型人群)。野生型人群的中位随访时间在两组之间相似(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组为 18.5 个月[IQR 15.2-23.6],化疗组为 19.2 个月[15.4-23.0])。在野生型人群中,总生存期有显著改善(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组为 18.6 个月[95%CI 16.0-21.2],化疗组为 13.9 个月[12.0-18.7];分层风险比[HR]0.79[95%CI 0.64-0.98];p=0.033)和无进展生存期(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组为 7.0 个月[95%CI 6.2-7.3],化疗组为 5.5 个月[4.4-5.9];分层 HR 0.64[95%CI 0.54-0.77];p<0.0001)。最常见的 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组 473 例中有 152 例[32%],化疗组 232 例中有 65 例[28%])、贫血(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组 473 例中有 138 例[29%],化疗组 232 例中有 47 例[20%])和中性粒细胞计数减少(阿特珠单抗联合化疗组 473 例中有 57 例[12%],化疗组 232 例中有 19 例[8%])。阿特珠单抗联合化疗组中有 112 例(24%)患者发生了治疗相关的严重不良事件,化疗组中有 30 例(13%)患者发生了治疗相关的严重不良事件。阿特珠单抗联合化疗组中有 8 例(2%)患者发生了治疗相关(任何治疗)死亡,化疗组中有 1 例(<1%)患者发生了治疗相关(任何治疗)死亡。
IMpower130 显示阿特珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为 IV 期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的一线治疗相比,总生存期和无进展生存期有显著和有临床意义的改善。没有发现新的安全性信号。这项研究支持阿特珠单抗联合铂类化疗作为转移性非小细胞肺癌的一线治疗。
这项研究的资金来源是 F. Hoffmann-La Roche。