Suppr超能文献

接受非抗TNF生物制剂或抗TNF-α药物治疗的韩国炎症性肠病患者发生严重感染和结核病的比较风险:一项基于全国人群的队列研究。

Comparative risk of serious infections and tuberculosis in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with non-anti-TNF biologics or anti-TNF-α agents: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

作者信息

Kim Min Jee, Kim Ye-Jee, Jeong Daehyun, Kim Seonok, Hong Seokchan, Park Sang Hyoung, Jo Kyung-Wook

机构信息

Division of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 31;17:17562848241265013. doi: 10.1177/17562848241265013. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.

DESIGN

This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.

METHODS

Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment ( = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.

CONCLUSION

In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

摘要

背景

在韩国人群中,尚未基于抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α药物和非抗TNF生物制剂(维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗)的使用情况,对炎症性肠病(IBD)患者发生严重感染和活动性结核病的风险进行同时评估。

目的

我们比较了接受非抗TNF生物制剂(维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗)或抗TNF-α药物治疗的韩国IBD患者发生严重感染和活动性结核病的风险。

设计

本研究是一项基于全国行政索赔数据的队列分析。

方法

回顾了2007年1月至2021年2月期间健康保险审查和评估服务机构的索赔数据(代表97%的韩国人口),纳入了2017年至2020年间开始使用维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗或抗TNF-α治疗的IBD成年患者(n = 6123)。分析了随访期间因严重感染需要住院/急诊就诊或活动性结核病风险的组间差异。

结果

在平均随访1.55±1.05年和0.84±0.69年期间接受抗TNF-α药物或维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗治疗的患者中,严重感染的发病率分别为9.43/100人年和6.87/100人年。多变量分析显示,维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗或抗TNF-α治疗的严重感染风险在组间无显著差异;与抗TNF-α药物相比,维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗的调整后相对风险为0.81(95%置信区间0.46 - 1.44,P = 0.478)。在接受抗TNF-α药物和维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗治疗的患者中,活动性结核病的发病率分别为每100人年0.87和0.37。与抗TNF-α药物相比,维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗的相对风险为0.31(95%置信区间0.07 - 1.26,P = 0.101)。在将维多珠单抗和乌司奴单抗与抗TNF-α药物进行比较的亚组分析中,观察到了类似的结果。

结论

在韩国IBD患者中与抗TNF-α药物相比,非抗TNF生物制剂(维多珠单抗/乌司奴单抗)发生严重感染或活动性结核病的风险往往较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2291/11292712/f7e6837c212e/10.1177_17562848241265013-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验