Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Alzheimer Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 13;24(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02021-9.
Studies focusing on patterns of psychotropic drug prescriptions (PDPs) for subpopulations of community-dwelling older people with dementia are lacking.
The aim of this study was to identify the longitudinal patterns of PDPs in subpopulations.
This retrospective study used electronic health records from general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands. People (N = 1278) firstly diagnosed with dementia between 2013 and 2015, aged 65 years or older, were selected and categorized into four subpopulations: community-dwelling (CD) group throughout follow-up, ultimately admitted to nursing homes (NH) group, ultimately died (DIE) group, and ultimately deregistered for unclear reasons (DeR) group. Generalised estimating equations were used to estimate the patterns of psychotropic drug prescriptions, after the diagnosis of dementia for a five-year follow-up, and 0-3 months before institutionalisation or death.
Over the five-year follow-up, antipsychotic prescriptions increased steadily in CD (OR = 1.07 [1.04-1.10]), NH (OR = 1.10 [1.04-1.15]), and DIE (OR = 1.05 [1.02-1.08]) groups. Similarly, prescriptions of antidepressants also showed upward trends in CD (OR = 1.04 [1.02-1.06]), NH (OR = 1.10 [1.02-1.18]), and DIE (OR = 1.04 [1.00-1.08]) groups. The other psychotropic drugs did not show clear changes over time in most of the subpopulations. In the three months before institutionalisation, antipsychotic prescriptions increased (OR = 2.12 [1.26-3.57]) in the NH group compared to prior periods. Likewise, before death, prescriptions of antipsychotics (OR = 1.74 [1.28-2.38]) and hypnotics and sedatives (OR = 2.11 [1.54-2.90]) increased in the DIE group, while anti-dementia drug prescriptions decreased (OR = 0.42 [0.26-0.69]).
After community-dwelling older people are diagnosed with dementia, all subpopulations' prescriptions of antipsychotics and antidepressants increase continuously during the follow-up. While we cannot judge whether these prescriptions are appropriate, GPs might consider a more reluctant use of psychotropic drugs and use alternative psychosocial interventions. Additionally, antipsychotic prescriptions rise considerably shortly before institutionalisation or death, which might reflect that older people experience more neuropsychiatric symptoms during this period.
针对社区居住的老年痴呆症患者亚人群的精神药物处方模式(PDP)进行研究的研究很少。
本研究旨在确定亚人群中 PDP 的纵向模式。
本回顾性研究使用了荷兰全科医生(GP)的电子健康记录。首先在 2013 年至 2015 年间诊断出患有痴呆症的年龄在 65 岁或以上的人群(N=1278)被选中,并分为四个亚组:整个随访期间为社区居住(CD)组,最终入住疗养院(NH)组,最终死亡(DIE)组,最终因不明原因注销(DeR)组。在诊断出痴呆症后的五年随访期间以及在机构化或死亡前的 0-3 个月,使用广义估计方程来估计精神药物处方的模式。
在五年的随访期间,CD(OR=1.07[1.04-1.10])、NH(OR=1.10[1.04-1.15])和 DIE(OR=1.05[1.02-1.08])组的抗精神病药物处方持续稳定增加。同样,CD(OR=1.04[1.02-1.06])、NH(OR=1.10[1.02-1.18])和 DIE(OR=1.04[1.00-1.08])组的抗抑郁药处方也呈上升趋势。大多数亚人群中,其他精神药物在大多数亚人群中没有明显的随时间变化。在机构化前的三个月中,NH 组的抗精神病药物处方增加(OR=2.12[1.26-3.57])。同样,在死亡前,DIE 组的抗精神病药物(OR=1.74[1.28-2.38])和催眠镇静药物(OR=2.11[1.54-2.90])的处方增加,而抗痴呆药物的处方减少(OR=0.42[0.26-0.69])。
在社区居住的老年痴呆症患者被诊断后,所有亚人群的抗精神病药物和抗抑郁药物的处方在随访期间持续增加。虽然我们无法判断这些处方是否合适,但全科医生可能会考虑更不愿意使用精神药物,并使用替代的心理社会干预措施。此外,在机构化或死亡前,抗精神病药物的处方大量增加,这可能反映出在此期间老年人经历了更多的神经精神症状。