Suppr超能文献

间充质基质细胞和透明质酸治疗马骨关节炎的效果

Treatment outcomes for equine osteoarthritis with mesenchymal stromal cells and hyaluronic acid.

作者信息

Luque Rodrigo Munevar, Henderson Bri, McCorkell Terence Connor, Alizadeh Amir Hamed, Russell Keith A, Koch Thomas G, Koenig Judith

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Rivendell Equine Veterinary Services, Grand Valley, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Equine Vet J. 2025 Sep;57(5):1245-1254. doi: 10.1111/evj.14531. Epub 2025 May 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are widely used to treat osteoarthritis (OA). Optimising dose, timing, and safety while comparing efficacy with standard therapies like hyaluronic acid (HA) is essential for their standardisation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of equine umbilical cord-derived (eCB) MSCs in client-owned horses with fetlock or carpus OA.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective single-blinded randomised clinical study.

METHODS

Horses diagnosed with fetlock or carpus OA via intra-articular (IA) anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either 10 or 20 million eCB-MSCs in HA or 3 mL of HA alone (control). Subjective lameness examinations were performed at baseline, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks post-treatment. Adverse reactions were evaluated 24-72 h post-injection. Follow-up surveys were sent to owners at 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven client-owned horses were enrolled. No significant adverse reactions occurred. Lameness outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups at 3 or 6 weeks (p > 0.05), though all groups showed improvement over time (p < 0.05). Median lameness change at 6 weeks was -1.5 (0.5) grades for HA, -2.0 (1.0) for 10-MSC + HA, and -2.0 (1.0) for 20-MSC + HA. Although return-to-work rates were not significantly different (p > 0.05), both MSC + HA groups had higher return rates to the same or higher work levels than HA-only (8 out of 9, 7 out of 9, and 5 out of 9, respectively).

MAIN LIMITATIONS

Small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The study aimed to assess MSC treatment safety and efficacy. Higher return-to-exercise rates were expected in the MSC groups at 18 weeks, but unexpectedly high rates in the HA group may have led to underpowering. A post hoc calculation suggests 30 horses per group would be needed to detect significant differences.

摘要

背景

间充质基质细胞(MSCs)被广泛用于治疗骨关节炎(OA)。在将其疗效与透明质酸(HA)等标准疗法进行比较时,优化剂量、时机和安全性对于其标准化至关重要。

目的

评估马脐带源(eCB)MSCs对患有跗关节或腕关节OA的客户拥有马匹的安全性和疗效。

研究设计

前瞻性单盲随机临床研究。

方法

通过关节内(IA)麻醉诊断为跗关节或腕关节OA的马匹被随机分配接受1000万或2000万eCB - MSCs加HA或仅3 mL HA(对照组)。在基线、治疗后3周和6周进行主观跛行检查。在注射后24 - 72小时评估不良反应。在18周时向马主发送随访调查问卷。

结果

纳入了27匹客户拥有的马匹。未发生显著不良反应。在3周或6周时,治疗组之间的跛行结果无显著差异(p > 0.05),尽管所有组随时间均有改善(p < 0.05)。6周时跛行变化的中位数,HA组为 - 1.5(0.5)级,10 - MSC + HA组为 - 2.0(1.0)级,20 - MSC + HA组为 - 2.0(1.0)级。尽管恢复工作率无显著差异(p > 0.05),但两个MSCs + HA组恢复到相同或更高工作水平的比率均高于仅HA组(分别为9匹中的8匹、9匹中的7匹和9匹中的5匹)。

主要局限性

样本量小。

结论

该研究旨在评估MSCs治疗的安全性和疗效。预计18周时MSCs组的恢复运动率会更高,但HA组意外的高恢复率可能导致检验效能不足。事后计算表明每组需要30匹马才能检测到显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce0d/12326944/cef0fdac1093/EVJ-57-1245-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验