Bansal Karan, Gupta Sachin, Nikhil Vineeta, Jaiswal Shikha, Jain Akanksha, Aggarwal Neha
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Adesh Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):154-158. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19.
The aim is to compare and evaluate the different finishing and polishing systems for the change in surface roughness of resin composites and enamel.
To conduct the study, 30 extracted human maxillary central incisors were selected, decoronated, and molded in self-cure acrylic molds. A box-shaped cavity of dimensions 3 mm × 3 mm × 2 mm was prepared in all the teeth. A nanohybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250) was then used to restore the prepared cavities. Thirty samples were divided into two groups, control group (Group A, = 10) and experimental group (Group B, = 20). The samples in Group A were cured through the Mylar matrix. The experimental group, i.e., Group B was divided into two subgroups, i.e., Subgroup BX, = 10 in which Sof-Lex polishing system was used for polishing the tooth surface and Subgroup BF, = 10 in which Shofu composite polishing system was used. The mean surface roughness (Ra in μm) of the composite restoration as well as for the enamel surface of all the samples before and after polishing was measured with a contact profilometer, and the values were correlated with scanning electron microscopy.
The statistical analysis was carried out using paired -test. The results exhibited a significant decrease in the surface roughness of the resin composite and enamel surface irrespective of the finishing and polishing system used. The mean surface roughness values demonstrated by Mylar matrix was the lowest followed by Sof-Lex polishing system. Shofu polishing system demonstrated the highest surface roughness values.
Finishing and polishing of composite restoration can achieve a surface roughness similar to that of enamel. Involvement of marginal enamel in finishing and polishing procedures carried out for composite restoration results in smoother enamel surface.
比较并评估不同的修整和抛光系统对树脂复合材料及牙釉质表面粗糙度变化的影响。
选取30颗拔除的人上颌中切牙,去除牙冠,在自凝丙烯酸模具中塑形。在所有牙齿上制备一个尺寸为3毫米×3毫米×2毫米的盒状窝洞。然后使用纳米混合复合树脂(Filtek Z250)修复制备好的窝洞。30个样本分为两组,对照组(A组,n = 10)和实验组(B组,n = 20)。A组样本通过聚酯薄膜基质固化。实验组即B组再分为两个亚组,即BX亚组(n = 10),使用Sof-Lex抛光系统对牙齿表面进行抛光;BF亚组(n = 10),使用松风复合树脂抛光系统。使用接触式轮廓仪测量所有样本在抛光前后复合树脂修复体以及牙釉质表面的平均表面粗糙度(Ra,单位为μm),并将这些值与扫描电子显微镜结果相关联。
采用配对t检验进行统计分析。结果显示,无论使用何种修整和抛光系统,树脂复合材料和牙釉质表面的粗糙度均显著降低。聚酯薄膜基质显示的平均表面粗糙度值最低,其次是Sof-Lex抛光系统。松风抛光系统显示的表面粗糙度值最高。
复合树脂修复体的修整和抛光可实现与牙釉质相似的表面粗糙度。在复合树脂修复体的修整和抛光过程中对边缘牙釉质进行处理可使牙釉质表面更光滑。