Kılıç Vahti, Gök Adem
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Microsc Res Tech. 2021 Sep;84(9):2058-2067. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23761. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk-fill and nano-filled resin-based composites using different methods. For the study, a total of 192 disc-shaped samples (10-mm wide and 2-mm thick) were prepared from four different bulk-fill composites (Filtek Bulk Fill, X-tra fil, Beautifil-Bulk Restorative and Fill Up) and two nano-filled resin-based composites (Ceram.x SphereTEC and Filtek Z550). The samples in each composite group were divided into four subgroups according to the polishing system to be used (n = 8). Four different polishing systems (Sof-Lex Diamond, Clearfil Twist Dia, HiLuster Plus, OptiDisc) were applied. Then, surface roughness measurements were carried out using a contact-type profilometer. One sample from each group was subjected to atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) examinations. Surface roughness (Ra) values were statistically analyzed in terms of composites and polishing systems using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and comparisons among groups were performed using the Tukey test (α = .05). Surface roughness values differed significantly in relation to the composite and polishing system used (p < .05). Among all composites, the lowest surface roughness values were obtained in the groups treated with the OptiDisc polishing system (except Beautifil-Bulk Restorative), whereas the highest roughness values were observed in the group polished with Clearfil Twist Dia (except Filtek Z550). X-tra fil showed the highest roughness value with all polishing systems tested. The findings of AFM analyses were consistent with profilometric measurements. The nano-filled resin-based composites showed smoother surface than bulk-fill composites and the type of the polishing systems was found to affect surface roughness.
本研究的目的是使用不同方法评估不同抛光系统对各种大块填料和纳米填料树脂基复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。在本研究中,从四种不同的大块填料复合材料(Filtek Bulk Fill、X-tra fil、Beautifil-Bulk Restorative和Fill Up)和两种纳米填料树脂基复合材料(Ceram.x SphereTEC和Filtek Z550)制备了总共192个圆盘形样品(宽10毫米,厚2毫米)。每个复合材料组中的样品根据要使用的抛光系统分为四个亚组(n = 8)。应用了四种不同的抛光系统(Sof-Lex Diamond、Clearfil Twist Dia、HiLuster Plus、OptiDisc)。然后,使用接触式轮廓仪进行表面粗糙度测量。每组中的一个样品进行原子力显微镜(AFM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)对复合材料和抛光系统的表面粗糙度(Ra)值进行统计分析,并使用Tukey检验(α = 0.05)进行组间比较。表面粗糙度值因所用的复合材料和抛光系统而有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在所有复合材料中,使用OptiDisc抛光系统处理的组(Beautifil-Bulk Restorative除外)获得了最低的表面粗糙度值,而使用Clearfil Twist Dia抛光的组(Filtek Z550除外)观察到最高的粗糙度值。X-tra fil在所有测试的抛光系统中显示出最高的粗糙度值。AFM分析的结果与轮廓测量结果一致。纳米填料树脂基复合材料的表面比大块填料复合材料更光滑,并且发现抛光系统的类型会影响表面粗糙度。