Bashetty Kusum, Joshi Sonal
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, The Oxford Dental College and Hospital Bommanahalli, Hosur Road, Bangalore - 560 068, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jan;13(1):34-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.62637.
The purpose of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of two direct resin composites polished with one-step and multi-step polishing systems.
The resin composites examined in this study include minifill-hybrid composite Esthet-X (DENTSPLY/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and packable composite Solitaire II (Heraeus Kulzer, Inc., Southbend). A total of 42 discs (10 x 2 mm), 21 specimens of each restorative material were fabricated. Seven specimens per composite group received no polishing treatment and served as control. For each composite group, the specimens were randomly divided into two polishing systems: One-step PoGo (Dentsply/Caulk, Milford, DE, USA) and multi-step Super Snap (Shofu, Inc. Kyoto, Japan). Polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions after being ground wet with 1200 grit silicon carbide paper. The surface roughness values were determined using a profilometer.
Data was subjected to student's t test at a significance level of 0.05. The smoothest surfaces were achieved under Mylar strips in both the composite groups. Mean Ra values ranged from 0.09 to 0.3 mum for Esthet-X group and from 0.18 to 0.3 mum for Solitaire II with different polishing systems. The ranking of the order of surface roughness on the basis of the type of composite was as follows: Esthet-X < Solitaire II for PoGo system and Esthet-X = Solitaire II for Super Snap; and the ranking for the polishing system was: PoGo < Super Snap (P </= 0.05).
The one-step polishing system (PoGo) produced better surface quality in terms of roughness than the multi-step system (Super Snap) for minifill-hybrid composite (Esthet-X), and it was equivalent to Super Snap for packable composites (Solitaire II). Minifill-hybrid presented a better surface finish than Solitaire II when PoGo polishing system was used. No significant difference was present in surface roughness between both the materials when Super Snap system was used.
本体外研究的目的是评估用一步法和多步法抛光系统抛光的两种直接树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度。
本研究中检测的树脂复合材料包括微填料混合复合材料Esthet-X(美国特拉华州米尔福德登士柏/卡ulk公司)和可压实复合材料Solitaire II(德国赫拉伊斯·库尔泽公司,南本德)。共制作了42个圆盘(10×2毫米),每种修复材料制作21个样本。每个复合材料组中有7个样本不进行抛光处理,作为对照。对于每个复合材料组,样本被随机分为两种抛光系统:一步法PoGo(美国特拉华州米尔福德登士柏/卡ulk公司)和多步法Super Snap(日本京都松风株式会社)。在用1200目碳化硅砂纸湿磨后,按照制造商的说明应用抛光系统。使用轮廓仪测定表面粗糙度值。
数据采用学生t检验,显著性水平为0.05。在两个复合材料组中,聚酯薄膜条下获得的表面最光滑。Esthet-X组的平均Ra值在0.09至0.3微米之间,Solitaire II组在不同抛光系统下的平均Ra值在0.18至0.3微米之间。基于复合材料类型的表面粗糙度顺序如下:对于PoGo系统,Esthet-X < Solitaire II;对于Super Snap系统,Esthet-X = Solitaire II;对于抛光系统的顺序为:PoGo < Super Snap(P≤0.05)。
对于微填料混合复合材料(Esthet-X),一步法抛光系统(PoGo)在粗糙度方面产生的表面质量优于多步法系统(Super Snap),对于可压实复合材料(Solitaire II),它与Super Snap相当。当使用PoGo抛光系统时,微填料混合材料的表面光洁度优于Solitaire II。使用Super Snap系统时,两种材料的表面粗糙度无显著差异。