• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

**策略分段 2.0:增强段落间连贯性的技巧。**

Strategic Paragraphing 2.0: Techniques for Enhancing Inter-Paragraph Coherence.

机构信息

Centre for Healthcare Education Research & Scholarship, and Department of Technology Enhanced Learning and Innovation, Office of Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Centre for Education Research & Innovation, and Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry and Faculty of Education, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 6;12(1):20-24. doi: 10.5334/pme.727. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/pme.727
PMID:36908742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9997110/
Abstract

Most of us pay attention to intra-paragraph coherence: the idea that the sentences within a paragraph should logically develop a single idea. But we forget, or we struggle to master inter-paragraph coherence: the idea that paragraphs should be arranged so that our argument develops logically. Proximity isn't always enough to signal to readers how paragraphs are building on one another to create a compelling argument. Readers may still end up having to infer how one paragraph is linked to the next, and when they can't make those inferences (or they make them incorrectly) coherence suffers. This Writer's Craft offers techniques to enhance inter-paragraph coherence more consciously so that readers don't fall through the cracks between our paragraphs.

摘要

我们大多数人都关注段落内的连贯性

即一个段落中的句子应该合乎逻辑地发展出一个单一的观点。但是我们会忘记或者很难掌握段落间的连贯性:即段落的排列方式应该使我们的论点具有逻辑性。仅仅通过临近的段落并不能向读者清楚地表明它们是如何相互衔接以形成一个有说服力的论点的。读者可能仍然需要推断出一个段落是如何与下一个段落联系起来的,而当他们无法进行这些推断(或者推断错误)时,连贯性就会受到影响。本写作技巧提供了一些增强段落间连贯性的技巧,以避免读者在我们的段落之间产生困惑。

相似文献

1
Strategic Paragraphing 2.0: Techniques for Enhancing Inter-Paragraph Coherence.**策略分段 2.0:增强段落间连贯性的技巧。**
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Jan 6;12(1):20-24. doi: 10.5334/pme.727. eCollection 2023.
2
Modeling coherence by ordering paragraphs using pointer networks.使用指针网络对段落进行排序来实现连贯性建模。
Neural Netw. 2020 Jun;126:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Statement-Pie: a strategy to improve the paragraph writing skills of adolescents with learning disabilities.陈述拼图:一种提高学习障碍青少年段落写作技巧的策略。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Nov;22(9):541-3, 553. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200904.
4
Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners.
Brain Lang. 1984 Jan;21(1):37-51. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90034-8.
5
The writer's voice repertoire: Exploring how health researchers accomplish a distinctive 'voice' in their writing.作者的声音储备:探索健康研究人员如何在写作中实现独特的“声音”。
Med Educ. 2024 May;58(5):523-534. doi: 10.1111/medu.15298. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
6
Creating Logical Flow When Writing Scientific Articles.撰写科技论文时的逻辑流程构建。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e275. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e275.
7
Measurement of reading speed with standardized texts: a comparison of single sentences and paragraphs.使用标准化文本测量阅读速度:单句与段落的比较
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;253(8):1369-75. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3065-4. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
8
The contribution of the right hemisphere to the organization of paragraphs.右半球对段落组织的贡献。
Cortex. 1983 Apr;19(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(83)80049-5.
9
From semi-conscious to strategic paragraphing.从半意识状态到策略性分段。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0507-4.
10
Challenging writer's block. How experienced authors make time to write.挑战写作瓶颈。经验丰富的作家如何挤出时间写作。
AAOHN J. 2000 Nov;48(11):512-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Writing for the reader: Using reader expectation principles to maximize clarity.为读者而写作:运用读者期望原则实现最大程度的清晰明了。
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Aug;11(4):228-231. doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00708-w. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Don't be reviewer 2! Reflections on writing effective peer review comments.不要成为审稿人2!关于撰写有效同行评审意见的思考。
Perspect Med Educ. 2021 Oct;10(5):299-303. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00670-z. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
From semi-conscious to strategic paragraphing.从半意识状态到策略性分段。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):98-100. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0507-4.