Mohammad Mosadeghrad Ali, Raposo Vitor, Rahimpour Langroudi Hamed
School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Faculty of Economics, Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), Centre of Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra (CEISUC), University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022 Dec 26;36:175. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.36.175. eCollection 2022.
A health system consists of people, institutions, and resources that provide health services to meet the health needs of the target population. Health systems in developed and developing countries have different characteristics from which some lessons can be learned. The aim of this study is to compare the two health systems of Portugal and Iran. The study was conducted in 2021 using a comparative study approach. The WHO's six building blocks framework was used for the comparison (i.e., governance and leadership, health financing, health workforce, health information system, medication, and service delivery). A six-step protocol was used to review the literature. International databases such as Medline / Pub Med and Scopus were searched. Policy briefs, reports, and dissertations were also reviewed. In both countries, the Ministry of Health is centrally responsible for health system governance. Healthcare financing is 80% government-funded in Portugal and 55% in Iran. In both countries, Health systems are mixed (NHS, NHI, and out-of-pocket model) and the unbalanced regional distribution is a major problem for human resources. In Iran, generic drugs are used, while Portugal combines generic and branded systems. In both countries, there are some challenges in integrating health information systems for health centers and hospitals. In both countries, some autonomy should be delegated to the regions. In Iran, public sector investment in the health system in Iran should be increased to reduce the currently very high out-of-pocket payments in the health system. In both countries, the distribution of resources, especially human resources, should be modified by designing some incentives. Increasing the share of generic drugs in Portugal will have a positive impact on cost control in the drug sector. It seems necessary to develop programs to strengthen the health information system in both countries.
卫生系统由人员、机构和资源组成,这些人员、机构和资源提供卫生服务以满足目标人群的健康需求。发达国家和发展中国家的卫生系统具有不同特点,从中可以吸取一些经验教训。本研究的目的是比较葡萄牙和伊朗的两种卫生系统。该研究于2021年采用比较研究方法进行。采用世界卫生组织的六个构建模块框架进行比较(即治理与领导、卫生筹资、卫生人力、卫生信息系统、药品和服务提供)。使用六步协议对文献进行综述。检索了Medline / Pub Med和Scopus等国际数据库。还查阅了政策简报、报告和论文。在这两个国家,卫生部对卫生系统治理负有中央责任。在葡萄牙,80%的医疗保健筹资由政府提供,在伊朗这一比例为55%。在这两个国家,卫生系统都是混合模式(国家卫生服务、国家健康保险和自费模式),区域分布不均衡是人力资源方面的一个主要问题。在伊朗,使用的是仿制药,而葡萄牙则将仿制药和品牌药系统结合起来。在这两个国家,将卫生中心和医院的卫生信息系统整合起来都存在一些挑战。在这两个国家,都应将一定的自主权下放给各地区。在伊朗,应增加对卫生系统的公共部门投资,以减少目前卫生系统中非常高的自费支付。在这两个国家,应通过设计一些激励措施来调整资源分配,特别是人力资源分配。增加葡萄牙仿制药的份额将对药品部门的成本控制产生积极影响。在这两个国家开展加强卫生信息系统的项目似乎很有必要。