• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。

The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9
PMID:21573746
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3102196/
Abstract

The Eriksen flanker task (Eriksen and Eriksen in Percept Psychophys 16:143-149, 1974) was distributed among pairs of participants to investigate whether individuals take into account a co-actor's S-R mapping even when coordination is not required. Participants responded to target letters (Experiment 1) or colors (Experiment 2) surrounded by distractors. When performing their part of the task next to another person performing the complementary part of the task, participants responded more slowly to stimuli containing flankers that were potential targets for their co-actor (incompatible trials), compared to stimuli containing identical, compatible, or neutral flankers. This joint Flanker effect also occurred when participants merely believed to be performing the task with a co-actor (Experiment 3). Furthermore, Experiment 4 demonstrated that people form shared task representations only when they perceive their co-actor as intentionally controlling her actions. These findings substantiate and generalize earlier results on shared task representations and advance our understanding of the basic mechanisms subserving joint action.

摘要

埃里克森侧翼任务(Eriksen 和 Eriksen 在 Percept Psychophys 16:143-149, 1974)在参与者对之间分配,以调查即使不需要协调,个体是否会考虑到共同行动者的 S-R 映射。参与者对目标字母(实验 1)或颜色(实验 2)做出反应,周围环绕着干扰项。当与执行任务的互补部分的另一个人一起执行任务时,与包含可能是共同行动者的目标的侧翼(不兼容试验)的刺激相比,参与者对包含相同、兼容或中性侧翼的刺激的反应速度较慢。当参与者仅认为自己与共同行动者一起执行任务时(实验 3),也会出现这种联合的 Flanker 效应。此外,实验 4 表明,只有当人们认为他们的共同行动者有意控制她的行动时,他们才会形成共同的任务表示。这些发现证实和推广了关于共同任务表示的早期结果,并推进了我们对联合行动基本机制的理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/a46e0621aa28/221_2011_2709_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/71a84a99370c/221_2011_2709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/47394d9eae8f/221_2011_2709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/0704eef0c21e/221_2011_2709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/a46e0621aa28/221_2011_2709_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/71a84a99370c/221_2011_2709_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/47394d9eae8f/221_2011_2709_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/0704eef0c21e/221_2011_2709_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb56/3102196/a46e0621aa28/221_2011_2709_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
2
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.共享任务还是共享动作?来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.联合侧翼效应与联合西蒙效应:关于联合兼容性效应背后过程的可比性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1808-1823. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1207690. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
4
How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.共同行为者的任务如何影响自身错误监控:来自社会事件相关电位研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):397-404. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2615-1. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
5
The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.任务共享中竞争的延续效应:来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e97991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097991. eCollection 2014.
6
Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.动作-效应共享在联合任务切换中会引发任务集共享。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 20.
7
The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.在联合任务设置中,动作选择和执行者选择的作用。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
9
Is Your Color My Color? Dividing the Labor of the Stroop Task Between Co-actors.你的颜色是我的颜色吗?共同行动者之间Stroop任务的分工
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 6;9:1407. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01407. eCollection 2018.
10
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.在联合任务切换中,没有证据表明存在任务集的共享表征。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct neural dynamics in joint versus side-by-side actions: insights from dual EEG.联合动作与并排动作中不同的神经动力学:来自双脑电图的见解
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 Jan 18;20(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf075.
2
The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.先进信息对共享手指预提示任务中共同表征的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Jul 2;243(7):183. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07128-2.
3
Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) mentally represent collaboration?: Action-learning and communication in a partnered task.

本文引用的文献

1
Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination.通过联合行动和人际协调实现社会联系。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):320-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01022.x.
2
The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other.虚拟共演者:社会西蒙效应不依赖于来自他人的在线反馈。
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;1:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208. eCollection 2010.
3
Contextual determinants of the social-transfer-of-learning effect.情境决定学习迁移效果。
黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)是否在心理上表征合作?:合作任务中的行动学习与交流
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325418. eCollection 2025.
4
Co-representation breaks down beyond the dyad in UK adults.在英国成年人中,共同表征在二元组之外就会瓦解。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318545. eCollection 2025.
5
Enhancement of joint flanker effect in intergroup competition.群体间竞争中联合侧翼效应的增强。
Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/pchj.796. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
6
Editorial: Theory of mind.社论:心理理论
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 9;15:1370048. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1370048. eCollection 2024.
7
Predicting others' actions from their social contexts.从社会背景预测他人的行为。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 12;13(1):22047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49081-6.
8
The neutral condition in conflict tasks: On the violation of the midpoint assumption in reaction time trends.冲突任务中的中性条件:反应时趋势违反中点假设。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):1023-1043. doi: 10.1177/17470218231201476. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
9
Beyond peripersonal boundaries: insights from crossmodal interactions.超越近体边界:来自跨模态相互作用的启示。
Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):121-132. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01154-0. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
Visual memory of a co-actor's target during joint search.共同搜索中对协作者目标的视觉记忆
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2068-2085. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01819-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):415-22. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2679-y. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
4
Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect.关于反应主体在联合兼容性效应中作用的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Nov;63(11):2159-71. doi: 10.1080/17470211003802426. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
5
Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.共同学习塑造人类表现:任务分担中的迁移效应。
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
6
The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations.顶叶-额皮质镜像回路的功能作用:诠释与误解。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Apr;11(4):264-74. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
7
Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task.共享任务还是共享空间?关于同伴在检测任务中的动作编码中的影响。
Cognition. 2010 Mar;114(3):348-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
8
When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions.当 1+1=1:通过在交叉和非交叉效应器条件下的联合西蒙效应揭示的独立参与者的统一。
Hum Mov Sci. 2009 Dec;28(6):726-37. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
9
Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect.动作共同表征:联合的SNARC效应。
Soc Neurosci. 2008;3(3-4):410-20. doi: 10.1080/17470910801900908.
10
Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing.真的轮到我了吗?一项关于任务共享的事件相关功能磁共振成像研究。
Soc Neurosci. 2007;2(2):81-95. doi: 10.1080/17470910701237989.