Park Dong Jin, Kang Ho Won, Kwon Se Yun, Seo Young Jin, Lee Kyung Seop, Kim Byung Hoon, Shin Teak Jun, Kim Won Tae, Kim Yong-June, Yun Seok Joong, Lee Sang-Cheol, Chung Jae-Wook, Choi Seock Hwan, Lee Jun Nyung, Kim Hyun Tae, Kim Tae-Hwan, Yoo Eun Sang, Kwon Tae Gyun, Jung Wonho, Ha Yun-Sok
Department of Urology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.
Department of Urology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
Prostate Int. 2023 Mar;11(1):34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
We aimed to evaluate the current status of first-line treatment options for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years in Korea.
The study included 873 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven prostate cancer at 5 institutions in Korea from January 2009 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were aged ≥75 years at diagnosis, prostate biopsy with ≥12 cores, and follow-up period ≥1 year. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records.
Primary treatment for prostate cancer in patients aged ≥75 years included androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (n = 614), radical prostatectomy (RP) (n = 114), and radiation therapy (n = 62). Among patients with RP, nine patients received ADT before RP. The RP group was younger with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score (GS), max percent positive cores, less positive cores, and less advanced clinical Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) stage compared with the ADT group. Multivariate analysis showed that age, ECOG PS, and PSA were independent prognostic factors for RP. When the ADT group was classified by therapeutic regimens, the most common therapeutic regimen was maximal androgen blockade (MAB) (n = 571), and leuprolide + bicalutamide (n = 330) was the most common MAB regimen. Multivariate analysis for secondary treatment showed that age, ECOG PS, GS, and clinical N1 or M1 stage were independent predictive factors. Enzalutamide was the most preferred treatment for tertiary treatment.
In patients with prostate cancer aged ≥75 years, the most common treatment option was MAB, and the leuprolide + bicalutamide was the most common MAB regimen. Age, ECOG PS, and PSA are the useful indicators of surgical treatment, which increased during the study period. Younger patients with high GS and advanced clinical stage were more likely to undergo secondary treatment.
我们旨在评估韩国75岁及以上前列腺癌患者一线治疗方案的现状。
本研究纳入了2009年1月至2018年12月期间在韩国5家机构经活检证实为前列腺癌的873例患者。纳入标准为诊断时年龄≥75岁、前列腺活检取材≥12针芯且随访期≥1年。临床数据通过电子病历进行回顾性收集。
75岁及以上前列腺癌患者的主要治疗方法包括雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(n = 614)、根治性前列腺切除术(RP)(n = 114)和放射治疗(n = 62)。在接受RP的患者中,有9例在RP前接受了ADT。与ADT组相比,RP组患者年龄更小,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)更好,初始前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、Gleason评分(GS)、阳性针芯最大百分比、阳性针芯数更少,临床肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期更早期。多因素分析显示,年龄、ECOG PS和PSA是RP的独立预后因素。当按治疗方案对ADT组进行分类时,最常见的治疗方案是最大雄激素阻断(MAB)(n = 571),亮丙瑞林+比卡鲁胺(n = 330)是最常见的MAB方案。二线治疗的多因素分析显示,年龄、ECOG PS、GS和临床N1或M1期是独立预测因素。恩杂鲁胺是三线治疗中最常用的治疗药物。
在75岁及以上前列腺癌患者中,最常见的治疗选择是MAB,亮丙瑞林+比卡鲁胺是最常见的MAB方案。年龄、ECOG PS和PSA是手术治疗的有用指标,在研究期间有所增加。GS高且临床分期较晚的年轻患者更有可能接受二线治疗。