Yamada Yasutaka, Sakamoto Shinichi, Tsujino Takuya, Saito Sinpei, Sato Kodai, Nishimura Kazuki, Fukushima Tatsuo, Nakamura Ko, Yoshikawa Yuki, Matsunaga Tomohisa, Maenosono Ryoichi, Kanesaka Manato, Arai Takayuki, Sazuka Tomokazu, Imamura Yusuke, Komura Kazumasa, Mikami Kazuo, Nakamura Kazuyoshi, Fukasawa Satoshi, Chiba Kazuto, Naya Yukio, Nagata Maki, Komaru Atsushi, Nakatsu Hiroomi, Azuma Haruhito, Ichikawa Tomohiko
Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
Prostate Int. 2025 Mar;13(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
Clinical significance of primary tumor progression in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is unclear.
Clinical data from 987 patients with mHSPC from multiple institutions between September 1999 and November 2023 were reviewed. The prognostic impact of primary tumor progression was examined along with other clinical parameters. Castration-resistant prostate cancer progression-free survival (CRPC PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed as clinical outcomes. Student's t-test, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier methods were utilized to validate the clinical significance.
The median age and initial prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) values were 74 and 221 ng/ml, respectively. 632 (64%) and 355 (36%) patients had clinical T stage ≤3 and 4 at diagnosis, respectively. mHSPC patients with clinical T stage 4 were more likely to have a higher grade group (GG), higher frequency of lymph node metastasis, lower hemoglobin (Hb), and more high-volume/risk disease in comparison with those with clinical T stage ≤3. Patients with cT4 were associated with shorter CRPC PFS (=0.0002) and OS ( < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified cT4 as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=1.33, =0.03) along with age, GG, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin (Alb), and high-volume disease. After propensity score matching, patients with cT4 had unfavorable OS in comparison with those with ≤cT3 (=0.0279). Furthermore, when combined with tumor volume, men with low-volume + cT4 achieved a prognosis comparable to that of patients with high-volume+≤cT3 and high-volume + cT4 (=0.6876 and =0.1679, respectively).
Bulkiness of primary prostate tumor was associated with worse outcomes in patients with mHSPC. Men with cT4 will require multimodal and intensive therapeutic strategies irrespective of tumor volume.
转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者原发性肿瘤进展的临床意义尚不清楚。
回顾了1999年9月至2023年11月期间多家机构987例mHSPC患者的临床资料。研究了原发性肿瘤进展与其他临床参数对预后的影响。将去势抵抗性前列腺癌无进展生存期(CRPC PFS)和总生存期(OS)作为临床结局进行分析。采用学生t检验、Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier方法来验证其临床意义。
中位年龄和初始前列腺特异性抗原(iPSA)值分别为74岁和221 ng/ml。632例(64%)和355例(36%)患者在诊断时临床T分期分别≤3期和4期。与临床T分期≤3期的mHSPC患者相比,临床T分期为4期的患者更有可能具有更高的分级组(GG)、更高的淋巴结转移频率、更低的血红蛋白(Hb)以及更多的高体积/高风险疾病。cT4期患者的CRPC PFS(=0.0002)和OS(<0.0001)较短。多变量分析确定cT4期是OS的独立预后因素(HR=1.33,=0.03),同时还有年龄、GG、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、白蛋白(Alb)和高体积疾病。倾向评分匹配后,cT4期患者与≤cT3期患者相比,OS较差(=0.0279)。此外,当与肿瘤体积相结合时,低体积+cT4期男性的预后与高体积+≤cT3期和高体积+cT4期患者相当(分别为=0.6876和=0.1679)。
原发性前列腺肿瘤的体积与mHSPC患者的不良结局相关。cT4期男性无论肿瘤体积如何,都需要多模式和强化治疗策略。