Mohan P Manju, Menon Ramshekhar N, Goswami Satyapal Puri, Thomas Sanjeev V, Cherian Ajith, Radhakrishnan Ashalatha
R Madhavan Nayar Centre for Comprehensive Epilepsy Care, Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Department of Speech Language Pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Department of Neurology, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):1080-1086. doi: 10.4103/aian.aian_222_22. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
To explore novel word learning via fast mapping (FM) and explicit encoding (EE) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).
16 right and 16 left temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE and LTLE) patients along with 32 normal controls (NC) underwent learning of 24 novel object name pairs through standard FM and EE techniques. Their learning was assessed via a three-choice alternate delayed recognition task on the day of learning and on the following day. Recognition scores were compared using nonparametric statistics across the groups with value set at <.05.
RTLE and NC performed similarly, while LTLE and NC differed significantly in novel word learning irrespective of the method of encoding. LTLE and RTLE differed in EE-based novel word learning alone. Further, with respect to encoding techniques, all groups performed better on EE compared to FM. The novel word associations learned via FM showed a lesser decline compared to EE following overnight integration in RTLE and NC.
Novel word learning via FM did not facilitate learning above EE in TLE patients or NC. But FM-based words could better overcome forgetting following overnight integration in RTLE and NC. Hence, it is possible that FM has the potential to improve retention of novel information following overnight integration in RTLE as in NC. However, its efficacy in improving retention in LTLE needs further evidence.
探讨颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者通过快速映射(FM)和明确编码(EE)进行新单词学习的情况。
16例右侧颞叶癫痫(RTLE)患者、16例左侧颞叶癫痫(LTLE)患者以及32名正常对照(NC)通过标准的FM和EE技术学习24对新的物体名称对。在学习当天和次日,通过三选一交替延迟识别任务评估他们的学习情况。使用非参数统计方法比较各组的识别分数,设定P值<0.05。
RTLE组和NC组表现相似,而LTLE组和NC组在新单词学习方面存在显著差异,无论编码方法如何。仅在基于EE的新单词学习中,LTLE组和RTLE组存在差异。此外,关于编码技术,与FM相比,所有组在EE上的表现都更好。在RTLE组和NC组中,经过一夜整合后,通过FM学习的新单词关联与EE相比下降幅度较小。
在TLE患者或NC中,通过FM进行新单词学习并不比EE更有助于学习。但在RTLE组和NC组中,基于FM的单词在经过一夜整合后能更好地克服遗忘。因此,与NC组一样,FM有可能改善RTLE组经过一夜整合后新信息的保留。然而,其在改善LTLE组信息保留方面的疗效需要进一步的证据。