McClain C S
Medical Anthropology Program University of California, San Francisco 94143.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1987 Dec;11(4):495-508. doi: 10.1007/BF00048495.
In recent years, vaginal birth after cesarean section has become increasingly available to American women. Presently, about two-thirds of women who have had one previous cesarean section choose in their current pregnancies to attempt a "trial of labor" for normal vaginal delivery. About one-third who are given the option still choose elective repeat cesarean section. This paper reports findings from a study conducted to explore how women with a previous cesarean section evaluated the two delivery options and what factors were important to them in making their choices. The data for the analysis were collected during semi-structured interviews of 100 prenatal care patients at three San Francisco Bay Area hospitals during their third trimester of pregnancy. Particular attention is given to two dimensions of patient decision making that clinical researchers studying childbirth after previous cesarean delivery have overlooked. The first describes the social motives that lead women to prefer one delivery option over the other. The second describes negotiation strategies that patients use with physicians to gain decision making power and to reduce uncertainty surrounding labor and delivery.
近年来,美国女性越来越有可能选择剖宫产术后经阴道分娩。目前,约三分之二曾有过一次剖宫产经历的女性在此次妊娠时会选择尝试“试产”以实现顺产。约三分之一有此选择机会的女性仍会选择择期再次剖宫产。本文报告了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在探究有过剖宫产经历的女性如何评估这两种分娩方式,以及在做出选择时哪些因素对她们很重要。分析所用数据是在旧金山湾区三家医院对100名产前护理患者在妊娠晚期进行半结构化访谈期间收集的。以往研究剖宫产术后分娩的临床研究人员忽略了患者决策的两个维度,本文对此给予了特别关注。第一个维度描述了促使女性偏好一种分娩方式而非另一种的社会动机。第二个维度描述了患者与医生用来获取决策权并减少分娩相关不确定性的协商策略。