NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Plymouth, N10, ITTC Building, Plymouth Science Park, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.
NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, 2.05 South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
J Prev (2022). 2023 Jun;44(3):267-276. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00717-9. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
Child poverty is associated with poorer physical and mental health, negative educational outcomes and adverse long-term social and psychological consequences, all of which impact on service demand and expenditure. Until now, however, prevention and early intervention practice has tended to focus on enhancing inter-parental relationships and parenting skills (e.g., via relationship skills education, home visiting, parenting programs, family therapy) or child language, social-emotional and life skills (e.g., early childhood education, school-based programs, youth mentoring). Programs often target low-income neighborhoods or families but rarely address poverty directly. While there is substantial evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions in improving child outcomes, null results are not uncommon and even positive effects are often small, short-term, and difficult to replicate. One avenue to enhance intervention effectiveness is to improve families' economic circumstances. There are several arguments for this refocusing. It is arguably unethical to focus on individual risk without acknowledging or seeking to address (where relevant) families' social and economic contexts, while the stigma and material constraints associated with poverty can make it harder for families to engage with psychosocial support. There is also evidence that increasing household income improves child outcomes. Although national policies to alleviate poverty are important, it is increasingly recognized that practice-based initiatives have a role to play (e.g., income maximization, devolved budgets, money management support). However, knowledge about their implementation and effectiveness is relatively thin. For instance, there is some evidence that co-located welfare rights advice in healthcare settings can improve recipients' financial circumstances and health, but it is mixed and of limited quality. Moreover, there is little rigorous research on whether and how such services affect mediators (parent-child interactions, parenting capacity) and/or child physical and psychosocial outcomes directly. We call for prevention and early intervention programs to attend more to families' economic circumstances, and for experimental studies to test their implementation, reach and effectiveness.
儿童贫困与身心健康状况较差、教育成果不佳以及长期的社会和心理负面影响相关,所有这些都会影响服务需求和支出。然而,到目前为止,预防和早期干预实践往往侧重于增强亲子关系和育儿技能(例如,通过关系技能教育、家访、育儿计划、家庭治疗)或儿童语言、社会情感和生活技能(例如,幼儿教育、学校计划、青年指导)。这些项目通常以低收入社区或家庭为目标,但很少直接解决贫困问题。虽然有大量证据表明这些干预措施在改善儿童结果方面的有效性,但也不乏无效的结果,即使是积极的效果通常也很小、短期,并且难以复制。提高干预效果的一个途径是改善家庭的经济状况。这种重新关注有几个理由。如果不承认或试图解决(在相关情况下)家庭的社会和经济背景,而只关注个体风险,这可以说是不道德的,而贫困相关的耻辱和物质限制使得家庭更难接受心理社会支持。也有证据表明,增加家庭收入可以改善儿童的结果。虽然减轻贫困的国家政策很重要,但越来越多的人认识到基于实践的举措也可以发挥作用(例如,收入最大化、下放预算、资金管理支持)。然而,关于其实施和有效性的知识相对较少。例如,有一些证据表明,在医疗保健环境中提供福利权益咨询可以改善受助人的财务状况和健康状况,但证据相互矛盾,质量有限。此外,关于此类服务是否以及如何直接影响中介(亲子互动、育儿能力)和/或儿童身体和心理社会结果的严格研究很少。我们呼吁预防和早期干预计划更加关注家庭的经济状况,并进行实验研究以检验其实施、覆盖范围和有效性。