Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Crohns Colitis. 2023 Oct 20;17(9):1528-1536. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad037.
The traditional long-term treatment goal of Crohn's disease [CD] is maintenance of corticosteroid-free clinical remission. Additional treatment targets, such as biochemical, endoscopic and patient-reported remission, are advocated. The relapsing-remitting nature of CD provides a challenge to the timing of target assessment. Cross-sectional assessment at predetermined moments disregards the health state in between measurements. In this systematic review, we provide an overview of outcomes used to assess long-term efficacy in clinical trials in CD.
A systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify clinical trials in luminal CD reporting on maintenance treatment [strategies] since 1995. Two independent reviewers selected eligible articles for full text retrieval, and assessed if long-term corticosteroid-free clinical, biochemical, endoscopic or patient-reported efficacy outcomes were used.
The search resulted in 2452 hits and 82 articles were included. Clinical activity was used in 80 studies [98%] as the long-term efficacy outcome, and in 21 [26%] of these concomitant corticosteroid use was taken into account. C-reactive protein was used in 32 studies [41%], faecal calprotectin in 15 studies [18%], endoscopic activity in 34 studies [41%] and patient-reported outcome in 32 studies [39%]. In seven studies, clinical, biochemical, endoscopic activity and the patient's perspective were measured. In most studies cross-sectional measures or multiple measurements over time were used.
In none of the published clinical trials in CD was sustained remission on all treatment targets reported. Cross-sectional outcomes at predetermined times were widely applied, leading to lack of information regarding sustained corticosteroid-free remission for this relapsing-remitting chronic disease.
克罗恩病(CD)的传统长期治疗目标是维持无皮质类固醇的临床缓解。提倡其他治疗目标,如生化、内镜和患者报告的缓解。CD 的复发性缓解性质对目标评估的时间提出了挑战。在预定时刻进行的横断面评估忽略了测量之间的健康状况。在本系统评价中,我们概述了用于评估 CD 临床试验中长期疗效的结果。
对 PubMed 和 EMBASE 数据库进行系统搜索,以确定自 1995 年以来报告维持治疗[策略]的腔内腔 CD 临床试验。两名独立的审查员选择合格的文章进行全文检索,并评估是否使用了长期无皮质类固醇的临床、生化、内镜或患者报告的疗效结果。
搜索结果为 2452 次命中,82 篇文章被纳入。80 项研究[98%]将临床活动作为长期疗效结果,其中 21 项[26%]考虑了同时使用皮质类固醇。32 项研究[41%]使用 C 反应蛋白,15 项研究[18%]使用粪便钙卫蛋白,34 项研究[41%]使用内镜活动,32 项研究[39%]使用患者报告的结果。在 7 项研究中,测量了临床、生化、内镜活动和患者的观点。在大多数研究中,使用了横断面测量或随时间多次测量。
在发表的 CD 临床试验中,没有一项报告维持所有治疗目标的持续缓解。广泛应用预定时间的横断面结果,导致缺乏关于这种复发性缓解慢性疾病持续无皮质类固醇缓解的信息。