Suppr超能文献

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗后非治愈性早期胃癌行附加手术与非胃切除术治疗的长期结局比较:一项荟萃分析。

Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus non-gastrectomy treatment for early gastric cancer after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Mar 5;136(5):528-535. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002605.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection is increasingly used in the treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC); however, about 15% of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) cases report non-curative resection. The efficacy of different remedial interventions after non-curative ESD for EGC remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of additional surgery and non-gastrectomy treatment for EGC patients who underwent non-curative ESD.

METHODS

All relevant studies published up to October 2021 were systematically searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. The medical subject headings terms "early gastric cancer," "gastrectomy," "endoscopic submucosal dissection," and their related free keywords were used to search relevant articles without restrictions on regions, publication types, or languages. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of OS were calculated using a random- or fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 17 retrospective cohort studies with 5880 patients, of whom 3167 underwent additional surgery and 2713 underwent non-gastrectomy. We found that patients receiving additional gastrectomy had better 5-year OS (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 3.05-4.31), DSS (OR = 3.22, 95% CI = 2.22-4.66), and DFS (OR = 4.39, 95% CI = 1.78-10.82) outcomes than those receiving non-gastrectomy treatments. The pooled HR also showed that gastrectomy following non-curative ESD significantly improved OS (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.33-0.48). In addition, elderly patients benefited from additional surgery in consideration of the 5-year OS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.41-0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-gastrectomy treatments, additional surgery offered better long-term survival outcomes for patients with EGC who underwent non-curative ESD.

摘要

背景

内镜下切除术(endoscopic resection)越来越多地应用于早期胃癌(EGC)的治疗中;然而,约 15%的内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)病例报告非治愈性切除。对于接受非治愈性 ESD 治疗的 EGC 患者,不同补救干预措施的疗效仍存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在比较非治愈性 ESD 后接受额外手术和非胃切除术治疗的 EGC 患者的长期结局。

方法

系统检索了截至 2021 年 10 月发表在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库中的所有相关研究。使用医学主题词“早期胃癌”、“胃切除术”、“内镜黏膜下剥离术”及其相关自由关键词检索相关文章,对地域、出版类型和语言没有限制。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale)评估纳入研究的质量。使用随机或固定效应模型计算 5 年总生存率(OS)、疾病特异性生存率(DSS)、无病生存率(DFS)和 OS 的风险比(HR)的 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

本荟萃分析纳入了 17 项回顾性队列研究,共 5880 例患者,其中 3167 例接受了额外手术,2713 例接受了非胃切除术。我们发现,接受额外胃切除术的患者 5 年 OS(OR=3.63,95%CI=3.05-4.31)、DSS(OR=3.22,95%CI=2.22-4.66)和 DFS(OR=4.39,95%CI=1.78-10.82)的结局更好,而接受非胃切除术治疗的患者结局更差。合并 HR 还显示,非治愈性 ESD 后行胃切除术可显著改善 OS(HR=0.40,95%CI=0.33-0.48)。此外,考虑到 5 年 OS,老年患者从额外手术中获益(HR=0.54,95%CI=0.41-0.72)。

结论

与非胃切除术治疗相比,非治愈性 ESD 后接受额外手术可为非治愈性 ESD 治疗的 EGC 患者提供更好的长期生存结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53b3/10106195/06031454f848/cm9-136-528-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验