• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证用于预测儿童和青少年创伤后神经外科干预的贝叶斯网络。

Development and validation of a Bayesian network predicting neurosurgical intervention after injury in children and adolescents.

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery (T.M.S., G.J.S., E.A.M., W.V.G.-T., R.S.B.), Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC; Division of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (D.O.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Neurological Surgery (C.O.), Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Biomedical Informatics (P.E.D., T.D.B.), University of Colorado School of Medicine; Department of Pediatrics (P.E.D., T.D.B, M.A.C.) Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jun 1;94(6):839-846. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003935. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000003935
PMID:36917100
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10205657/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Timely surgical decompression improves functional outcomes and survival among children with traumatic brain injury and increased intracranial pressure. Previous scoring systems for identifying the need for surgical decompression after traumatic brain injury in children and adults have had several barriers to use. These barriers include the inability to generate a score with missing data, a requirement for radiographic imaging that may not be immediately available, and limited accuracy. To address these limitations, we developed a Bayesian network to predict the probability of neurosurgical intervention among injured children and adolescents (aged 1-18 years) using physical examination findings and injury characteristics observable at hospital arrival.

METHODS

We obtained patient, injury, transportation, resuscitation, and procedure characteristics from the 2017 to 2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Project database. We trained and validated a Bayesian network to predict the probability of a neurosurgical intervention, defined as undergoing a craniotomy, craniectomy, or intracranial pressure monitor placement. We evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic and calibration curves. We evaluated the percentage of contribution of each input for predicting neurosurgical intervention using relative mutual information (RMI).

RESULTS

The final model included four predictor variables, including the Glasgow Coma Scale score (RMI, 31.9%), pupillary response (RMI, 11.6%), mechanism of injury (RMI, 5.8%), and presence of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (RMI, 0.8%). The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.91) and had a calibration slope of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.29-1.26) with a y intercept of 0.05 (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.25).

CONCLUSION

We developed a Bayesian network that predicts neurosurgical intervention for all injured children using four factors immediately available on arrival. Compared with a binary threshold model, this probabilistic model may allow clinicians to stratify management strategies based on risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

摘要

背景

对于颅内压增高的创伤性脑损伤患儿,及时进行手术减压可改善其功能结局和生存情况。既往用于识别儿童和成人创伤性脑损伤后是否需要手术减压的评分系统存在多种使用障碍。这些障碍包括:无法在数据缺失的情况下生成评分,需要可能无法立即获得的影像学检查,以及准确性有限。为了解决这些局限性,我们开发了一个贝叶斯网络,利用入院时可观察到的体格检查结果和损伤特征,来预测受伤儿童和青少年(1-18 岁)接受神经外科干预的概率。

方法

我们从 2017 年至 2019 年创伤质量改进项目数据库中获取了患者、损伤、转运、复苏和手术特征。我们使用贝叶斯网络对预测神经外科干预的概率进行了训练和验证,神经外科干预的定义为进行开颅术、颅骨切除术或颅内压监测。我们使用接收者操作特征曲线和校准曲线下面积来评估模型性能。我们使用相对互信息(RMI)评估每个输入预测神经外科干预的贡献百分比。

结果

最终模型包含四个预测变量,包括格拉斯哥昏迷评分(RMI,31.9%)、瞳孔反应(RMI,11.6%)、损伤机制(RMI,5.8%)和院前心肺复苏的存在(RMI,0.8%)。该模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.90(95%置信区间 [CI],0.89-0.91),校准斜率为 0.77(95%CI,0.29-1.26),y 截距为 0.05(95%CI,-0.14 至 0.25)。

结论

我们开发了一个贝叶斯网络,使用入院时即可获得的四个因素预测所有受伤儿童的神经外科干预。与二元阈值模型相比,这种概率模型可以让临床医生根据风险分层管理策略。

证据等级

预后和流行病学;III 级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/df1db7157e0e/nihms-1878185-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/43a80bb00021/nihms-1878185-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/7a0361cf0031/nihms-1878185-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/9c938ebfeee2/nihms-1878185-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/df1db7157e0e/nihms-1878185-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/43a80bb00021/nihms-1878185-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/7a0361cf0031/nihms-1878185-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/9c938ebfeee2/nihms-1878185-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb52/10205657/df1db7157e0e/nihms-1878185-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Bayesian network predicting neurosurgical intervention after injury in children and adolescents.开发和验证用于预测儿童和青少年创伤后神经外科干预的贝叶斯网络。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jun 1;94(6):839-846. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003935. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
Development and validation of a Bayesian belief network predicting the probability of blood transfusion after pediatric injury.开发和验证贝叶斯信念网络预测儿科损伤后输血概率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Feb 1;94(2):304-311. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003709. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
Development and Validation of a Bayesian Network Predicting Intubation Following Hospital Arrival Among Injured Children.预测受伤儿童入院后插管情况的贝叶斯网络的开发与验证
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Feb;60(2):161888. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161888. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
4
Impact of Cushing's sign in the prehospital setting on predicting the need for immediate neurosurgical intervention in trauma patients: a nationwide retrospective observational study.库欣征在院前环境中对预测创伤患者立即进行神经外科干预需求的影响:一项全国性回顾性观察研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 9;24(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0341-1.
5
Predictors of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury: New Insight Using Receiver Operating Curve Indices and Bayesian Network Analysis.创伤性脑损伤预后的预测因素:使用受试者工作特征曲线指标和贝叶斯网络分析的新见解
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158762. eCollection 2016.
6
Recalibrating the Glasgow Coma Score as an Age-Adjusted Risk Metric for Neurosurgical Intervention.重新校准格拉斯哥昏迷评分作为神经外科干预的年龄调整风险指标。
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:696-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Development and Prospective Validation of Tools to Accurately Identify Neurosurgical and Critical Care Events in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.用于准确识别创伤性脑损伤儿童神经外科和重症监护事件的工具的开发与前瞻性验证
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 May;18(5):442-451. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001120.
8
A comparison of the prehospital motor component of the Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) to the prehospital total GCS (tGCS) as a prehospital risk adjustment measure for trauma patients.院前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(mGCS)的运动成分与院前总格拉斯哥昏迷量表(tGCS)的比较,作为创伤患者的院前风险调整措施。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):68-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.844870.
9
Effects of Primary Decompressive Craniectomy on the Outcomes of Serious Traumatic Brain Injury with Mass Lesions, and Independent Predictors of Operation Decision.原发性减压性颅骨切除术对伴有占位性病变的严重创伤性脑损伤预后的影响及手术决策的独立预测因素。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e396-e405. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.158. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
10
The Base Deficit, International Normalized Ratio, and Glasgow Coma Scale (BIG) Score, and Functional Outcome at Hospital Discharge in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患儿的基础赤字、国际标准化比值、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(BIG)评分与住院期间功能预后的关系
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;20(10):970-979. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002050.

引用本文的文献

1
Human intention recognition for trauma resuscitation: An interpretable deep learning approach for medical process data.创伤复苏中的人类意图识别:一种针对医疗过程数据的可解释深度学习方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jan;161:104767. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104767. Epub 2024 Dec 31.