Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Health Care Management, College of Health Technology, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 14;18(3):e0283099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283099. eCollection 2023.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education for the public may improve bystander intention to perform CPR on cardiac arrest patients. Studies have shown that different CPR education intervention methods can improve learning performance, with key indicators including attitude toward to CPR, intention to perform CPR, and degree of CPR knowledge and skills. The present study compared the traditional face-to-face method to hybrid and virtual reality (VR) methods to observe difference in learning performance and length of performance retention. This study adopted randomized controlled trial to compare CPR learning performance between traditional face-to-face, hybrid, and VR methods. Participants from each intervention group completed a pretest and 2 posttests. The measurement tools included an attitude and intention questionnaire, knowledge examination, and skill examination with a RESUSCI ANNE QCPR ® manikin. The performance among all participants in pretest showed no significant difference between the intervention groups, indicating no difference in their background attitude, knowledge, and skill level. Significant differences were observed in the average degree of intention to perform CPR between the hybrid and traditional groups in 1st and 2nd posttest. Compared to the pretest results, the posttests revealed significantly higher attitude toward CPR, intention to perform CPR, knowledge examination results, accuracy of overall chest compression, accuracy of CPR procedure, accuracy of AED usage, accuracy of chest compression rate, and accuracy of chest compression depth. The average time to reattending CPR learning and practice session was 11-12 weeks reported by participants. The hybrid and VR methods to CPR education resulted in the same level of improvement in learning performance as traditional face-to-face teaching. The suggested frequency for renewing CPR knowledge and skills is 12 weeks which may be considered in new strategies aimed at promoting CPR education and exposure to the public.
心肺复苏术(CPR)的公众教育可以通过提高旁观者对心脏骤停患者进行 CPR 的意愿来得到改善。研究表明,不同的 CPR 教育干预方法可以提高学习效果,关键指标包括对 CPR 的态度、实施 CPR 的意愿,以及 CPR 知识和技能的程度。本研究将传统的面对面方法与混合式和虚拟现实(VR)方法进行了比较,以观察学习效果和保持绩效的时间上的差异。本研究采用随机对照试验,比较传统面对面、混合式和 VR 方法之间的 CPR 学习效果。每组参与者完成前测和 2 次后测。测量工具包括态度和意愿问卷、知识考试和使用 RESUSCI ANNE QCPR ® 模拟人进行的技能考试。所有参与者的前测成绩显示,干预组之间的表现没有显著差异,这表明他们的背景态度、知识和技能水平没有差异。在 1 次和 2 次后测中,混合式组与传统组在实施 CPR 的意愿平均程度上存在显著差异。与前测结果相比,后测显示参与者对 CPR 的态度、实施 CPR 的意愿、知识考试成绩、整体胸外按压的准确性、CPR 程序的准确性、AED 使用的准确性、胸外按压频率的准确性和胸外按压深度的准确性均有显著提高。参与者报告的重新参加 CPR 学习和实践课程的平均时间为 11-12 周。CPR 教育的混合式和 VR 方法与传统的面对面教学一样,在学习效果上都有相同程度的提高。建议每 12 周更新一次 CPR 知识和技能,这可能会被考虑在旨在促进公众接受 CPR 教育和接触 CPR 的新策略中。