Suppr超能文献

TikTok 上的猴痘(猴天花)信息:质量和受众参与度分析。

Mpox (monkeypox) information on TikTok: analysis of quality and audience engagement.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Mar;8(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011138.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online information on mpox (monkeypox) is not well studied. We have analysed the video content, information quality, and audience engagement of mpox-related videos on TikTok.

METHODS

Using a hashtag-based searching strategy, we identified 2462 mpox-related videos on TikTok from 1 January to 11 August 2022; 85 were included after exclusion criteria screening. Videos were evaluated for content on features and treatment of mpox. Video and information quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument and the (JAMA) criteria. We recorded video source, evaluation scores, and viewer engagement metrics. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis and multiple linear regression for factor-association studies.

RESULTS

Of the 85 videos, two assessed all content topics and highlighted 33% of all content items in clinical guidelines. The overall average score for the videos was 39.56 of 80 on the DISCERN instrument and 1.93 of 4 on the JAMA criteria. No video met all JAMA criteria. Subgroup analysis based on author identity suggested the variance in video scores by source (p<0.05 for all). Overall scores were higher for videos produced by doctors and science communicators than for those made by institutional users, nurses, and the general public. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that having people in the video (69.20, p=0.0001) and including information on treatment choices (1.15, p=0.045) were significant, independent determinants of audience engagement.

CONCLUSION

Public-directed TikTok videos on mpox frequently provide incomplete, inaccurate information, highlighting the potential risks of using TikTok as a health information source.

摘要

背景

关于猴痘(猴痘)的在线信息尚未得到很好的研究。我们分析了 TikTok 上与猴痘相关的视频的视频内容、信息质量和观众参与度。

方法

使用基于标签的搜索策略,我们从 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 8 月 11 日在 TikTok 上识别了 2462 个与猴痘相关的视频;排除标准筛选后,有 85 个被纳入。评估了有关猴痘特征和治疗的视频内容。使用 DISCERN 工具和 JAMA 标准评估视频和信息质量。我们记录了视频来源、评估分数和观众参与度指标。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行统计分析,使用多元线性回归进行因素关联研究。

结果

在 85 个视频中,有两个评估了所有内容主题,并突出了临床指南中所有内容项目的 33%。DISCERN 工具的视频平均总分为 39.56(满分 80 分),JAMA 标准的平均总分为 1.93(满分 4 分)。没有一个视频符合所有 JAMA 标准。基于作者身份的亚组分析表明,来源(p<0.05)的视频评分差异。医生和科学传播者制作的视频总评分高于机构用户、护士和公众制作的视频。多元线性回归分析表明,视频中有人员(69.20,p=0.0001)和包含治疗选择信息(1.15,p=0.045)是观众参与度的显著、独立决定因素。

结论

针对公众的 TikTok 上关于猴痘的视频经常提供不完整、不准确的信息,突出了使用 TikTok 作为健康信息来源的潜在风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a534/10016284/27c0f555a71b/bmjgh-2022-011138f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验