Neonatal Intensive care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Oct;32(10):589-599. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015247. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Surveys based on hypothetical situations suggest that health-care providers agree that disclosure of errors and adverse events to patients and families is a professional obligation but do not always disclose them. Disclosure rates and reasons for the choice have not previously been studied.
To measure the proportion of errors disclosed by neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) professionals to parents and identify motives for and barriers to disclosure.
Prospective, observational study nested in a randomised controlled trial (Study on Preventing Adverse Events in Neonates (SEPREVEN); ClinicalTrials.gov). Event disclosure was not intended to be related to the intervention tested.
10 NICUs in France with a 20-month follow-up, starting November 2015.
n=1019 patients with NICU stay ≥2 days with ≥1 error.
Characteristics of errors (type, severity, timing of discovery), patients and professionals, self-reported motives for disclosure and non-disclosure.
Rate of error disclosure reported anonymously and voluntarily by physicians and nurses; perceived parental reaction to disclosure.
Among 1822 errors concerning 1019 patients (mean gestational age: 30.8±4.5 weeks), 752 (41.3%) were disclosed. Independent risk factors for non-disclosure were nighttime discovery of error (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.75 to 3.30), milder consequence (for moderate consequence: OR 1.85; 95% CI 0.89 to 3.86; no consequence: OR 6.49; 95% CI 2.99 to 14.11), a shorter interval between admission and error, error type and fewer beds. The most frequent reported reasons for non-disclosure were parental absence at its discovery and a perceived lack of serious consequence.
In the particular context of the SEPREVEN randomised controlled trial of NICUs, staff did not disclose the majority of errors to parents, especially in the absence of moderate consequence for the infant.
NCT02598609.
基于假设情况的调查表明,医疗保健提供者认为向患者及其家属披露错误和不良事件是一种职业义务,但他们并不总是这样做。此前尚未研究过披露率和选择的原因。
测量新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)专业人员向父母披露错误的比例,并确定披露的动机和障碍。
前瞻性、观察性研究,嵌套在一项随机对照试验(预防新生儿不良事件研究(SEPREVEN);ClinicalTrials.gov)中。事件披露并非旨在与所测试的干预措施相关。
法国 10 家 NICU,随访 20 个月,始于 2015 年 11 月。
入住 NICU 超过 2 天且至少发生 1 次错误的 1019 名患者。
错误特征(类型、严重程度、发现时间)、患者和专业人员、自我报告的披露和不披露动机。
医生和护士匿名自愿报告的错误披露率;感知到的父母对披露的反应。
在涉及 1019 名患者(平均胎龄:30.8±4.5 周)的 1822 个错误中,有 752 个(41.3%)被披露。不披露的独立危险因素包括夜间发现错误(比值比 2.40;95%置信区间 1.75 至 3.30)、后果较轻(中度后果:比值比 1.85;95%置信区间 0.89 至 3.86;无后果:比值比 6.49;95%置信区间 2.99 至 14.11)、入住与错误之间的间隔较短、错误类型和床位较少。未披露的最常见原因是发现错误时父母不在场和感知到的后果不严重。
在 SEPREVEN 新生儿重症监护病房的随机对照试验的特殊背景下,工作人员没有向父母披露大多数错误,尤其是在对婴儿没有中度后果的情况下。
NCT02598609。