Jakobsen Krisztina V, Hunter Brianna K, Simpson Elizabeth A
James Madison University, 97 E. Grace St, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA.
Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 May;85(4):1106-1126. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02685-6. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Face pareidolia occurs when random or ambiguous inanimate objects are perceived as faces. While real faces automatically receive prioritized attention compared with nonface objects, it is unclear whether pareidolic faces similarly receive special attention. We hypothesized that, given the evolutionary importance of broadly detecting animacy, pareidolic faces may have enough faceness to activate a broad face template, triggering prioritized attention. To test this hypothesis, and to explore where along the faceness continuum pareidolic faces fall, we conducted a series of dot-probe experiments in which we paired pareidolic faces with other images directly competing for attention: objects, animal faces, and human faces. We found that pareidolic faces elicited more prioritized attention than objects, a process that was disrupted by inversion, suggesting this prioritized attention was unlikely to be driven by low-level features. However, unexpectedly, pareidolic faces received more privileged attention compared with animal faces and showed similar prioritized attention to human faces. This attentional efficiency may be due to pareidolic faces being perceived as not only face-like, but also as human-like, and having larger facial features-eyes and mouths-compared with real faces. Together, our findings suggest that pareidolic faces appear automatically attentionally privileged, similar to human faces. Our findings are consistent with the proposal of a highly sensitive broad face detection system that is activated by pareidolic faces, triggering false alarms (i.e., illusory faces), which, evolutionarily, are less detrimental relative to missing potentially relevant signals (e.g., conspecific or heterospecific threats). In sum, pareidolic faces appear "special" in attracting attention.
当随机或模糊的无生命物体被感知为面孔时,就会出现面部空想性视错觉。与非面孔物体相比,真实面孔会自动获得优先关注,但目前尚不清楚空想性视错觉面孔是否同样会受到特殊关注。我们假设,鉴于广泛检测生物运动在进化上的重要性,空想性视错觉面孔可能具有足够的面部特征来激活一个宽泛的面部模板,从而触发优先关注。为了验证这一假设,并探索空想性视错觉面孔在面部特征连续统中的位置,我们进行了一系列点探测实验,将空想性视错觉面孔与其他直接竞争注意力的图像配对:物体、动物面孔和人类面孔。我们发现,空想性视错觉面孔比物体引发了更多的优先关注,这一过程会因倒置而受到干扰,这表明这种优先关注不太可能由低级特征驱动。然而,出乎意料的是,与动物面孔相比,空想性视错觉面孔获得了更多的优先关注,并且与人类面孔表现出相似的优先关注。这种注意力效率可能是由于空想性视错觉面孔不仅被视为类似面孔,而且被视为类似人类,并且与真实面孔相比具有更大的面部特征——眼睛和嘴巴。总之,我们的研究结果表明,空想性视错觉面孔似乎自动具有注意力优势,类似于人类面孔。我们的研究结果与这样一种观点一致,即存在一个高度敏感的宽泛面部检测系统,该系统被空想性视错觉面孔激活,触发误报(即虚幻面孔),从进化的角度来看,这相对于错过潜在相关信号(例如同种或异种威胁)来说危害较小。总之,空想性视错觉面孔在吸引注意力方面似乎很“特殊”。