Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2023 Jun;58(6):673-679. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-01949-x. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse. The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, CI95%:0.56-1.51, p = 0.75). Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0.59). However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.85, p = 0.02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.
抗 CD19 嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CART)在二线治疗失败后,迅速被采用为侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤(ABCL)的标准三线治疗方法,尽管缺乏与基于异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)的策略的直接比较。使用西班牙移植和细胞治疗小组(GETH-TC)登记处,我们选择了具有以下特征的患者:2016 年至 2021 年期间进行 CART 或 alloHCT;年龄≥18 岁;ABCL 诊断;≥2 线治疗;并且在复发时作为治疗方法使用抗 CD19 CART 或 alloHCT。该分析共包括 316 名(CART=215,alloHCT=101)患者。CART 和 alloHCT 队列的中位随访时间分别为 15 个月和 36 个月。在多变量分析中,CART 被证实与 alloHCT 对主要研究终点(无进展生存期)相似(风险比 [HR] 0.92,95%CI:0.56-1.51,p=0.75)。此外,当分析仅限于输注时具有化疗敏感疾病(完全和部分缓解)的患者(CART=26,alloHCT=93)时,未报告差异(+18 个月时无进展生存期:65%对 55%,p=0.59)。然而,CART 的非复发死亡率较低(HR 0.34,95%CI:0.13-0.85,p=0.02)。鉴于较低的毒性和相似的生存结果,这些结果表明在 alloHCT 之前使用 CART。