Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Majmaah University, Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):4256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31375-4.
Plyometric training (PT) has been shown to have numerous benefits and few harmful effects. This study aimed to compare the effects of PT vs. strength training on muscle strength, sprint, and lower limb functional performance in soccer players. Ninety participants (mean age 22.5 years) were equally and randomly divided into three groups: a plyometric training group (PTG; n = 30), a strength training group (STG; n = 30), and a control group (CG; n = 30). In PTG: bounding, hurdling, and drop jumping exercises were performed. In STG: isometric exercises of knee extension (at 60º knee flexion), quadriceps (in supine), hip adductors (in crook lying), and straight leg raise were performed. In CG: no specific training was given. All interventions were performed for eight weeks. Isometric strength (IS), sprint (ST), and single-leg triple hop (SLTH) tests were outcome measures. The wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for with-in-group analysis, and Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney u tests were used for between-group analyses. In PTG: in comparison to a baseline measurement, IS increased by 8.83% (p < 0.05), ST decreased by 20.14% (p < 0.05), and SLTH increased by 7.78% (p < 0.05). In STG: IS increased by 15.76% (p < 0.05), ST decreased by 30.26% (p < 0.05), and SLTH increased by 12.41% (p < 0.05). In CG: IS increased by 5.72% (p < 0.05), ST decreased by 15.54% (p < 0.05), and SLTH increased by 4.41% (p < 0.05). The greatest improvements were observed in STG, followed by PTG and CG. Strength training was found to be more effective than PT in improving muscle strength, sprint, and lower limb functional performance in male soccer players.
跳躍式訓練(PT)已被證明具有許多益處,且幾乎沒有有害影響。本研究旨在比較 PT 與力量訓練對足球運動員肌肉力量、短跑和下肢功能表現的影響。90 名參與者(平均年齡 22.5 歲)被平均且隨機分為三組:跳躍式訓練組(PTG;n = 30)、力量訓練組(STG;n = 30)和對照組(CG;n = 30)。在 PTG 中:進行跳躍、跨欄和跳躍下落練習。在 STG 中:進行膝伸展(60°膝屈曲)、股四頭肌(仰臥)、髖內收肌(側臥)和直腿抬高的等長練習。在 CG 中:沒有進行特定的訓練。所有的干預措施都持續了八周。等速力量(IS)、短跑(ST)和單腿三跳(SLTH)測試是評估的指標。使用 Wilcoxon 符號秩檢驗進行組內分析,使用克勞斯瓦爾茲和曼-惠特尼 U 檢驗進行組間分析。在 PTG 中:與基線測量相比,IS 增加了 8.83%(p<0.05),ST 降低了 20.14%(p<0.05),SLTH 增加了 7.78%(p<0.05)。在 STG 中:IS 增加了 15.76%(p<0.05),ST 降低了 30.26%(p<0.05),SLTH 增加了 12.41%(p<0.05)。在 CG 中:IS 增加了 5.72%(p<0.05),ST 降低了 15.54%(p<0.05),SLTH 增加了 4.41%(p<0.05)。最大的改善發生在 STG,其次是 PTG 和 CG。力量訓練在提高男性足球運動員的肌肉力量、短跑和下肢功能表現方面比 PT 更有效。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-6-22
J Strength Cond Res. 2014-10
J Strength Cond Res. 2017-9
Front Sports Act Living. 2025-7-16
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025-1-21
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-6-22
J Strength Cond Res. 2021-4-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020-5-28