Hammami Mehréz, Negra Yassine, Shephard Roy J, Chelly Mohamed Souhaiel
1Research Unit (UR17JS01), Sport Performance, Health and Society, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Saîd, University of Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia;2Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and3Department of Biological Science Applied for Physical Activities and Sport, Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of Manouba, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):901-912. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001815.
Hammami, M, Negra, Y, Shephard, RJ, and Chelly, MS. The effect of standard strength vs. contrast strength training on the development of sprint, agility, repeated change of direction, and jump in junior male soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 901-912, 2017-The aim was to compare the impact of 2 differing strength training (ST) programs on the athletic performance of junior male soccer players at a critical phase during their competitive season. Participants aged 16.0 ± 0.5 years were randomly assigned between control (C, n = 12), standard ST (n = 16), and contrast strength training (CST, n = 16), each performed twice a week. Athletic performance was assessed before and after the intervention using 8 tests: 40-m sprint, 4 × 5-m sprint (S4 × 5), 9-3-6-3-9 m sprint with 180° turns (S180°), 9-3-6-3-9 m sprint with backward and forward running (SBF), repeated shuttle sprint ability (RSSA), repeated change of direction (RCOD), squat jump (SJ), and countermovement jump (CMJ). The control group's (CG) performance tended to improve in some tests and decrease in others, but these changes were not statistically significant. Both training programs enhanced all sprint performances relative to controls (p ≤ 0.05). The strength training group (SG) and the CST group (CSG) increased significantly in S180°, SBF, and S4 × 5 relative to CG, although the S4 × 5 also increased in CSG relative to SG (p ≤ 0.05). No intergroup difference of RSSA performance was observed. The RCOD parameters increased significantly in CSG relative to both SG and CG (p ≤ 0.05). The SJ and CMJ height increased significantly in both experimental groups (p < 0.000). We conclude that during the competitive season, some measures of athletic performance in male soccer players were increased more by 8 weeks of CST than by ST.
哈马米,M,内格拉,Y,谢泼德,RJ,以及谢利,MS。标准强度与对比强度训练对青少年男子足球运动员短跑、敏捷性、反复变向和跳跃能力发展的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》31(4): 901 - 912,2017年——目的是比较两种不同强度训练(ST)方案对青少年男子足球运动员在其竞争赛季关键阶段运动表现的影响。年龄在16.0 ± 0.5岁的参与者被随机分配到对照组(C,n = 12)、标准强度训练组(n = 16)和对比强度训练组(CST,n = 16),每组每周训练两次。在干预前后使用8项测试评估运动表现:40米短跑、4×5米短跑(S4×5)、带有180°转弯的9 - 3 - 6 - 3 - 9米短跑(S180°)、带有前后跑的9 - 3 - 6 - 3 - 9米短跑(SBF)、反复穿梭短跑能力(RSSA)、反复变向(RCOD)、深蹲跳(SJ)和反向纵跳(CMJ)。对照组(CG)在一些测试中的表现趋于改善,而在其他测试中则有所下降,但这些变化无统计学意义。相对于对照组,两种训练方案均提高了所有短跑成绩(p≤0.05)。强度训练组(SG)和CST组(CSG)在S180°、SBF和S4×5方面相对于CG显著提高,尽管CSG在S4×5方面相对于SG也有所提高(p≤0.05)。未观察到RSSA表现的组间差异。CSG的RCOD参数相对于SG和CG均显著提高(p≤0.05)。两个实验组的SJ和CMJ高度均显著增加(p < 0.000)。我们得出结论,在竞争赛季期间,8周的CST比ST更能提高男子足球运动员的一些运动表现指标。