Iannone Luigi Francesco, Burgalassi Andrea, Vigani Giulia, Tabasso Giorgio, De Cesaris Francesco, Chiarugi Alberto, Geppetti Pierangelo
Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Headache Center and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Cephalalgia. 2023 Apr;43(4):3331024231160519. doi: 10.1177/03331024231160519.
A pharmacological class effect was initially proposed for monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway. However, preliminary evidence shows that switching patients who were non-responding to one monoclonal antibody to another could provide some benefit. Herein, we assess treatment response to an anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/receptor monoclonal antibody in patients who have failed to respond to anti-calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies calcitonin gene related peptide/ligand monoclonal antibodies and vice versa. In addition, we select non-responders to the first anti- monoclonal antibody by three or five more stringent variables.
Retrospective cohort study including outpatients treated consecutively with two anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies. Ineffectiveness to the first monoclonal antibody was assessed using three (MIDAS score, monthly headache days, and analgesic monthly days) variables or five (monthly headache days, MIDAS score, analgesic monthly days, analgesic monthly number and HIT-6 score) variables in the same cohort of patients. The primary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in monthly headache days, response rate, and persistence in medication overuse at three months of treatment with the second anti-CGRP mAb.
In patients selected by three variables, a sustained reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, MIDAS and HIT-6 scores was observed at month-3 of treatment with the second monoclonal antibody. Ten (45.4%) patients achieved at least a ≥30% response rate. No difference was reported switching anti-CGRP mAb against ligand or receptor. In the patient subgroup selected by five variables, only HIT-6 was reduced from baseline at month-3. However, a trend toward a reduction in monthly headache days, analgesic monthly days, and MIDAS score was observed at month-3.
Switching anti-calcitonin gene related peptide monoclonal antibodies in selected patients might be an option to achieve or improve clinical benefit. More studies are required to establish the effectiveness of switching these treatments.
最初有人提出针对降钙素基因相关肽途径的单克隆抗体具有药理学类效应。然而,初步证据表明,将对一种单克隆抗体无反应的患者换用另一种单克隆抗体可能会带来一些益处。在此,我们评估了对降钙素基因相关肽/配体单克隆抗体无反应的患者,使用抗降钙素基因相关肽/受体单克隆抗体的治疗反应,反之亦然。此外,我们通过三个或五个更严格的变量筛选出对第一种抗单克隆抗体无反应的患者。
回顾性队列研究,纳入连续接受两种抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗的门诊患者。在同一组患者中,使用三个变量(偏头痛残疾评定量表(MIDAS)评分、每月头痛天数和每月使用镇痛药天数)或五个变量(每月头痛天数、MIDAS评分、每月使用镇痛药天数、每月使用镇痛药次数和HIT - 6评分)评估对第一种单克隆抗体治疗无效的情况。主要终点是在使用第二种抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗三个月时,每月头痛天数相对于基线的绝对变化、缓解率以及药物过度使用的持续情况。
在通过三个变量筛选出的患者中,使用第二种单克隆抗体治疗三个月时,每月头痛天数、每月使用镇痛药天数、MIDAS评分和HIT - 6评分持续下降。10名(45.4%)患者实现了至少≥30%的缓解率。换用抗降钙素基因相关肽配体或受体的单克隆抗体治疗,未报告有差异。在通过五个变量筛选出的患者亚组中,仅在治疗三个月时HIT - 6评分较基线有所降低。然而,在治疗三个月时观察到每月头痛天数、每月使用镇痛药天数和MIDAS评分有下降趋势。
在选定的患者中换用抗降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体可能是实现或改善临床获益的一种选择。需要更多研究来确定换用这些治疗方法的有效性。