• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健自我管理的公共卫生政策演变:以加拿大安大略省为例。

Evolution of public health policy on healthcare self-management: the case of Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Office of Research Services and School of Business, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09191-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09191-3
PMID:36918904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10011770/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As people live longer, they are at increased risk for chronic diseases and disability. Self-management is a strategy to improve health outcomes and quality of life of those who engage in it. This study sought to gain a better understanding of the factors, including digital technology, that affect public health policy on self-management through an analysis of government policy in the most populous and multicultural province in Canada: Ontario. The overarching question guiding the study was: What factors have influenced the development of healthcare self-management policies over time?

METHODS

Archival research methods, combining document review and evaluation, were used to collect data from policy documents published in Ontario. The documents were analyzed using the READ approach, evaluated using a data extraction table, and synthesized into themes using the model for health policy analysis.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 1985, and May 5, 2022, 72 policy documents on self-management of health were retrieved from databases, archives, and grey literature. Their contents largely focussed on self-management of general chronic conditions, while 47% (n = 18/72) mention diabetes, and 3% (n = 2/72) focussed solely on older adults. Digital technologies were mentioned and were viewed as tools to support self-management in the context of healthcare delivery and enhancing healthcare infrastructure (i.e., telehealth or software in healthcare settings). The actors involved in the policy document creation included mostly Ontario government agencies and departments, and sometimes expert organizations, community groups and engaged stakeholders. The results suggest that several factors including pressures on the healthcare system, hybrid top-down and bottom-up policymaking, and political context have influenced the nature and implementation timing of self-management policy in Ontario.

CONCLUSIONS

The policy documents on self-management of health reveal a positive evolution of the content discussed over time. The changes were shaped by an evolving context, both from a health and political perspective, within a dynamic system of interactions between actors. This research helps understand the factors that have shaped changes and suggests that a critical evidence-based approach on public health policy is needed in understanding processes involved in the development of healthcare self-management policies from the perspective of a democratic governing system.

摘要

背景

随着人们寿命的延长,他们患慢性病和残疾的风险增加。自我管理是一种改善参与其中的人的健康结果和生活质量的策略。本研究旨在通过分析加拿大人口最多和文化最多元化的省份安大略省的政府政策,更好地了解影响自我管理公共卫生政策的因素,包括数字技术。指导这项研究的首要问题是:随着时间的推移,哪些因素影响了医疗保健自我管理政策的发展?

方法

采用档案研究方法,结合文件审查和评估,从安大略省发布的政策文件中收集数据。使用 READ 方法分析文件,使用数据提取表进行评估,并使用健康政策分析模型将其综合为主题。

结果

1985 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 5 日,从数据库、档案和灰色文献中检索到 72 份关于健康自我管理的政策文件。它们的内容主要集中在一般慢性病的自我管理上,而 47%(n=18/72)提到糖尿病,3%(n=2/72)仅关注老年人。数字技术被提及,并被视为医疗保健提供和增强医疗保健基础设施(即医疗保健环境中的远程医疗或软件)中支持自我管理的工具。参与政策文件创建的行为者主要包括安大略省政府机构和部门,有时还包括专家组织、社区团体和参与的利益相关者。结果表明,包括医疗保健系统压力、混合自上而下和自下而上的决策制定以及政治背景在内的几个因素影响了安大略省自我管理政策的性质和实施时间。

结论

健康自我管理政策文件揭示了所讨论内容随时间的积极演变。这些变化是由一个不断变化的背景塑造的,从健康和政治的角度来看,都是在一个由行为者之间的互动构成的动态系统中。这项研究有助于了解影响变化的因素,并表明需要从民主治理体系的角度,对公共卫生政策采取批判性的循证方法,以了解医疗保健自我管理政策制定过程中涉及的因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/07d1d82841ba/12913_2023_9191_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/45816d6a42ff/12913_2023_9191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/2f9e253cd9e0/12913_2023_9191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/08c06b320a8d/12913_2023_9191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/07d1d82841ba/12913_2023_9191_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/45816d6a42ff/12913_2023_9191_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/2f9e253cd9e0/12913_2023_9191_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/08c06b320a8d/12913_2023_9191_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/335c/10012456/07d1d82841ba/12913_2023_9191_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of public health policy on healthcare self-management: the case of Ontario, Canada.医疗保健自我管理的公共卫生政策演变:以加拿大安大略省为例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09191-3.
2
Policymaker perspectives on self-management of disease and disabilities using information and communication technologies.政策制定者视角下利用信息和通信技术进行疾病和残疾的自我管理。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 14;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01004-7.
3
A comparative analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing in Ontario and Quebec: the role of governing style in health technology innovation & adoption.安大略省和魁北克省的非侵入性产前检测比较分析:治理风格在医疗技术创新和采用中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 9;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09245-6.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
Understanding the COVID-19 Vaccine Policy Terrain in Ontario Canada: A Policy Analysis of the Actors, Content, Processes, and Context.了解加拿大安大略省的新冠疫苗政策态势:对参与者、内容、流程及背景的政策分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 31;11(4):782. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11040782.
6
Moving towards a new vision: implementation of a public health policy intervention.迈向新愿景:公共卫生政策干预措施的实施
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 17;16:412. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3056-3.
7
Frameworks for self-management support for chronic disease: a cross-country comparative document analysis.慢性病自我管理支持框架:一项跨国比较文献分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3387-0.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Public health human resources: a comparative analysis of policy documents in two Canadian provinces.公共卫生人力资源:加拿大两个省份政策文件的比较分析
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Feb 24;12:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-13.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A realist review of factors critical for the implementation of eHealth in chronic disease management.对慢性病管理中电子健康实施的关键因素进行的现实主义综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 2;25(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12361-0.
2
Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes of General Population About Prostate Cancer-Associated Risk Factors: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies Focusing on Lifestyle.普通人群对前列腺癌相关危险因素的认知、知识和态度:一项聚焦生活方式的定性研究系统评价
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Apr;27(4):375-389. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01653-7. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Framework for policymaking on self-management of health by older adults using technologies.

本文引用的文献

1
Telemedicine maybe an effective solution for management of chronic disease during the COVID-19 epidemic.远程医疗可能是新冠疫情期间慢性病管理的有效解决方案。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2021 Sep 29;22:e48. doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000517.
2
Generating political priority for skin cancer primary prevention: A case study from Aotearoa New Zealand.为皮肤癌一级预防争取政治优先权:来自新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的案例研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jul;33(3):740-750. doi: 10.1002/hpja.545. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
3
Shift to Virtual Self-Management Programs During COVID-19: Ensuring Access and Efficacy for Older Adults.
老年人利用技术进行自我健康管理的政策制定框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Mar 5;22(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01119-5.
4
Policymaker perspectives on self-management of disease and disabilities using information and communication technologies.政策制定者视角下利用信息和通信技术进行疾病和残疾的自我管理。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jun 14;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01004-7.
在 COVID-19 期间转向虚拟自我管理计划:确保老年人能够获得并受益。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 31;9:663875. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.663875. eCollection 2021.
4
The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid systematic review.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间电子健康、远程医疗和远程医学在慢性病患者中的作用:一项快速系统评价
Digit Health. 2021 Apr 19;7:20552076211009396. doi: 10.1177/20552076211009396. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
The Effects of the Health System Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Chronic Disease Management: A Narrative Review.卫生系统应对新冠疫情对慢性病管理的影响:一项叙述性综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Feb 15;14:575-584. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S293471. eCollection 2021.
6
Trends in prevalence of chronic disease and multimorbidity in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省慢性疾病和多种疾病患病率趋势。
CMAJ. 2021 Feb 22;193(8):E270-E277. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.201473.
7
Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach.卫生政策研究中的文献分析:READ方法。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Feb 16;35(10):1424-1431. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa064.
8
A systematic review of mobile health technologies to support self-management of concurrent diabetes and hypertension.移动医疗技术支持糖尿病和高血压并发患者自我管理的系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):939-945. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa029.
9
Delineating the concept of self-management in chronic conditions: a concept analysis.阐述慢性病自我管理的概念:概念分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e027775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027775.
10
The Medicalization of Population Health: Who Will Stay Upstream?人群健康的医学化:谁将站在上游?
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):36-39. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12363. Epub 2018 Dec 13.