Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Jun 8;33(12):7500-7505. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad055.
Recent work has shown that the occipital place area (OPA)-a scene-selective region in adult humans-supports "visually guided navigation" (i.e. moving about the local visual environment and avoiding boundaries/obstacles). But what is the precise role of OPA in visually guided navigation? Considering humans move about their local environments beginning with crawling followed by walking, 1 possibility is that OPA is involved in both modes of locomotion. Another possibility is that OPA is specialized for walking only, since walking and crawling are different kinds of locomotion. To test these possibilities, we measured the responses in OPA to first-person perspective videos from both "walking" and "crawling" perspectives as well as for 2 conditions by which humans do not navigate ("flying" and "scrambled"). We found that OPA responded more to walking videos than to any of the others, including crawling, and did not respond more to crawling videos than to flying or scrambled ones. These results (i) reveal that OPA represents visual information only from a walking (not crawling) perspective, (ii) suggest crawling is processed by a different neural system, and (iii) raise questions for how OPA develops; namely, OPA may have never supported crawling, which is consistent with the hypothesis that OPA undergoes protracted development.
最近的研究表明,成人的枕部位置区域(OPA)——一个对场景具有选择性的区域——支持“视觉引导导航”(即,在局部视觉环境中移动并避开边界/障碍物)。但是,OPA 在视觉引导导航中的精确作用是什么呢?考虑到人类从爬行开始,然后是行走,在其局部环境中移动,有一种可能性是 OPA 参与了这两种运动模式。另一种可能性是,OPA 专门用于行走,因为行走和爬行是不同的运动方式。为了验证这些可能性,我们测量了 OPA 对来自“行走”和“爬行”视角的第一人称视角视频的反应,以及人类不进行导航的两种情况(“飞行”和“混乱”)的反应。我们发现,OPA 对行走视频的反应比对其他任何视频(包括爬行)的反应都更强烈,而对爬行视频的反应并不比对飞行或混乱视频的反应更强烈。这些结果:(i) 揭示了 OPA 只代表来自行走(而非爬行)视角的视觉信息;(ii) 表明爬行是由不同的神经机制处理的;(iii) 提出了关于 OPA 如何发展的问题;即,OPA 可能从未支持过爬行,这与 OPA 经历了漫长的发展过程的假设是一致的。