• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

党派之争和反精英世界观是西班牙多党制下科学和健康信仰的相关因素。

Partisanship and anti-elite worldviews as correlates of science and health beliefs in the multi-party system of Spain.

机构信息

University of Exeter, UK.

University of Utah, USA.

出版信息

Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):761-780. doi: 10.1177/09636625231154131. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

DOI:10.1177/09636625231154131
PMID:36919002
Abstract

In a national sample of 5087 Spaniards, we examine the prevalence of 10 specific misperceptions over five separate science and health domains (climate change, 5G technology, genetically modified foods, vaccines, and homeopathy). We find that misperceptions about genetically modified foods and general health risks of 5G technology are particularly widespread. While we find that partisan affiliation is not strongly associated with any of the misperceptions aside from climate change, we find that two distinct dimensions of an anti-elite worldview-anti-expert and conspiratorial mindsets-are better overall predictors of having science and health misperceptions in the Spanish context. These findings help extend our understanding of polarization around science beyond the most common contexts (e.g. the United States) and support recent work suggesting anti-elite sentiments are among the most important predictors of factual misperceptions.

摘要

在一项针对 5087 名西班牙人的全国性抽样调查中,我们研究了五个不同科学和健康领域(气候变化、5G 技术、转基因食品、疫苗和顺势疗法)中 10 种特定误解的流行程度。我们发现,关于转基因食品和 5G 技术对一般健康风险的误解尤其普遍。虽然我们发现,除了气候变化之外,党派关系与任何误解都没有很强的关联,但我们发现,反精英世界观的两个不同维度——反专家和阴谋心态——在西班牙背景下,是更好的预测出现有科学和健康误解的总体指标。这些发现有助于我们超越最常见的语境(例如美国)来理解科学领域的极化问题,并支持最近的研究工作,该研究工作表明,反精英情绪是最重要的错误事实认知预测因素之一。

相似文献

1
Partisanship and anti-elite worldviews as correlates of science and health beliefs in the multi-party system of Spain.党派之争和反精英世界观是西班牙多党制下科学和健康信仰的相关因素。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Aug;32(6):761-780. doi: 10.1177/09636625231154131. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
When experts matter: Variations in consensus messaging for vaccine and genetically modified organism safety.当专家至关重要时:疫苗和转基因生物安全共识信息的差异。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Feb;33(2):210-226. doi: 10.1177/09636625231188594. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.理解生物医学研究辩论中的公众舆论:超越政治党派之争,关注对科学与社会的信念。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e88473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088473. eCollection 2014.
4
Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes.减少情感两极分化的干预措施不一定能改善反民主态度。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jan;7(1):55-64. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01466-9. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
5
Corrections of political misinformation: no evidence for an effect of partisan worldview in a US convenience sample.纠正政治错误信息:在美国便利样本中,没有证据表明党派世界观有影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 12;376(1822):20200145. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0145. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
6
Defeating Merchants of Doubt: Subjective certainty and self-affirmation ameliorate attitude polarization via partisan motivated reasoning.战胜怀疑论者:主观确定性和自我肯定通过党派动机推理改善态度极化。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Oct;29(7):729-744. doi: 10.1177/0963662520939315. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Time and skeptical opinion content erode the effects of science coverage on climate beliefs and attitudes.时间和怀疑论观点会削弱科学报道对气候信仰和态度的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 28;119(26):e2122069119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122069119. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
8
Anti-elite attitudes and support for independent candidates.反精英态度与独立候选人支持。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 12;18(10):e0292098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292098. eCollection 2023.
9
Personal hardship narrows the partisan gap in COVID-19 and climate change responses.个人困境缩小了 COVID-19 和气候变化应对措施中的党派分歧。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 15;119(46):e2120653119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120653119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
10
The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science.阴谋论思维和世界观在预测对科学的排斥方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 2;8(10):e75637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075637. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of professional socialisation in confidence in vaccines and vaccination decision-makers: Insights from a large multi-wave survey in France.专业社会化在对疫苗及疫苗接种决策者的信心方面所起的作用:来自法国一项大型多轮调查的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0328548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328548. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing Motivations and Channels for Nutritional Information Verification in Spanish University Communities.评估西班牙大学社区营养信息核实的动机和渠道
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 28;22(3):357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030357.
3
Context matters: How to research vaccine attitudes and uptake after the COVID-19 crisis.
背景很重要:如何研究新冠疫情危机后的疫苗态度及接种情况。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2367268. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2367268. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
A Health Media Literacy Intervention Increases Skepticism of Both Inaccurate and Accurate Cancer News Among U.S. Adults.一项健康媒体素养干预措施提高了美国成年人对不准确和准确的癌症新闻的怀疑态度。
Ann Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;58(12):820-831. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae054.
5
Political polarization may affect attitudes towards vaccination. An analysis based on the European Social Survey data from 23 countries.政治极化可能会影响人们对接种疫苗的态度。基于来自 23 个国家的欧洲社会调查数据的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):375-379. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae002.