School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, Australia.
Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, University of Texas, Texas, TX, United States.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 15;25:e42927. doi: 10.2196/42927.
Collaboration across health care professions is critical in efficiently and effectively managing complex and chronic health conditions, yet interprofessional care does not happen automatically. Professional associations have a key role in setting a profession's agenda, maintaining professional identity, and establishing priorities. The associations' external communication is commonly undertaken through social media platforms, such as Twitter. Despite the valuable insights potentially available into professional associations through such communication, to date, their messaging has not been examined.
This study aimed to identify the cues disseminated by professional associations that represent 5 health care professions spanning 5 nations.
Using a back-iterative application programming interface methodology, public tweets were sourced from professional associations that represent 5 health care professions that have key roles in community-based health care: general practice, nursing, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and social work. Furthermore, the professional associations spanned Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. A lexical analysis was conducted of the tweets using Leximancer (Leximancer Pty Ltd) to clarify relationships within the discourse.
After completing a lexical analysis of 50,638 tweets, 7 key findings were identified. First, the discourse was largely devoid of references to interprofessional care. Second, there was no explicit discourse pertaining to physiotherapists. Third, although all the professions represented in this study support patients, discourse pertaining to general practitioners was most likely to be connected with that pertaining to patients. Fourth, tweets pertaining to pharmacists were most likely to be connected with discourse pertaining to latest and research. Fifth, tweets about social workers were unlikely to be connected with discourse pertaining to health or care. Sixth, notwithstanding a few exceptions, the findings across the different nations were generally similar, suggesting their generality. Seventh and last, tweets pertaining to physiotherapists were most likely to refer to discourse pertaining to profession.
The findings indicate that health care professional associations do not use Twitter to disseminate cues that reinforce the importance of interprofessional care. Instead, they largely use this platform to emphasize what they individually deem to be important and advance the interests of their respective professions. Therefore, there is considerable opportunity for professional associations to assert how the profession they represent complements other health care professions and how the professionals they represent can enact interprofessional care for the benefit of patients and carers.
在有效管理复杂和慢性健康状况方面,医疗保健专业人员之间的协作至关重要,但跨专业护理并非自动发生。专业协会在制定专业议程、维护专业身份和确定优先事项方面发挥着关键作用。协会的对外沟通通常通过 Twitter 等社交媒体平台进行。尽管通过这种沟通可以深入了解专业协会,但迄今为止,尚未对其信息传递进行检查。
本研究旨在确定代表跨越 5 个国家的 5 个医疗保健专业的专业协会传播的信息提示。
使用回溯迭代应用程序编程接口方法,从代表在社区医疗保健中发挥关键作用的 5 个医疗保健专业的专业协会(全科医生、护理、药剂师、物理治疗师和社会工作者)获取公共推文。此外,这些专业协会跨越澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰、英国和美国。使用 Leximancer(Leximancer Pty Ltd)对推文进行词汇分析,以澄清话语中的关系。
在对 50638 条推文进行词汇分析后,确定了 7 个主要发现。首先,该话语在很大程度上没有提到跨专业护理。其次,没有明确涉及物理治疗师的论述。第三,尽管本研究中代表的所有专业都支持患者,但与患者相关的论述最有可能与全科医生的论述相关。第四,与药剂师相关的推文最有可能与最新和研究相关的论述相关。第五,与社会工作者相关的推文不太可能与健康或护理相关的论述相关。第六,尽管有一些例外,不同国家的发现基本相似,表明这些发现具有普遍性。第七也是最后一点,与物理治疗师相关的推文最有可能提到与专业相关的论述。
研究结果表明,医疗保健专业协会并未使用 Twitter 传播强化跨专业护理重要性的信息提示。相反,他们主要利用这个平台强调他们个人认为重要的事情,并推进各自专业的利益。因此,专业协会有很大的机会强调他们所代表的专业如何补充其他医疗保健专业,以及他们所代表的专业人员如何为患者和护理人员实施跨专业护理。