Margareta Brännström, Ulf Isaksson, C Fischer Grönlund
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 26;26(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01270-w.
Studies show that healthcare professionals encounter ethically difficult situations in everyday clinical practice, and there is a need for interprofessional communication in organised forms. Ethics communication in groups (ECG), based on Habermas's theory of communicative actions, is a form of support for interprofessional communications about ethical issues. The 'one to five method' is a practical tool for healthcare professionals with education in ethics to facilitate ECG in everyday clinical practice.
To evaluate the effects of organised ECG using the 'one to five' method for health care professionals concerning moral distress and ethical climate at wards with round-the-clock care compared with a control group.
This was a prospective cluster randomised study with an open, non-blinded design.
Nine wards with different medical specialisations at one university hospital were purposefully and then randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) (n = 5) and a control group (CG) (n = 4). An ECG was performed monthly for six months in the intervention group. Prospective assessments were made at 3 and 6 months using the Measure of Moral Distress-Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP), Moral Distress Thermometer (MDT), and the Swedish Ethical Climate Questionnaire (SwECQ).
Between-group analyses showed no significant differences in moral distress over time. Within-group analysis revealed that the intervention group scored lower moral distress concerning clinical causes at the patient level at the 3-month measurement point but returned to the same level as the control group at six months. The ethical climate was rated higher in the intervention group at 3 and 6 months.
Participation in ECG likely fosters shared values and an enhanced ethical climate, though no significant differences in moral distress were observed. Moral distress may persist despite interventions, but open dialogue and professional growth can foster moral resilience. This study found a positive relationship between an ethical climate and participation in ethics communication groups (ECG) using the 'one to five method.' However, the small sample size limited statistical power. Future research should include larger-scale, multicentre studies and qualitative research to explore experiences with ECG.
ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT05146102 (2021-11-05).
研究表明,医疗保健专业人员在日常临床实践中会遇到伦理困境,因此需要以有组织的形式进行跨专业沟通。基于哈贝马斯交往行为理论的群体伦理沟通(ECG)是一种支持跨专业伦理问题沟通的形式。“一到五方法”是一种实用工具,可供接受过伦理学教育的医疗保健专业人员在日常临床实践中促进群体伦理沟通。
与对照组相比,评估使用“一到五”方法进行有组织的群体伦理沟通对全天候护理病房的医疗保健专业人员的道德困扰和伦理氛围的影响。
这是一项前瞻性整群随机研究,采用开放、非盲法设计。
一所大学医院的九个具有不同医学专业的病房被有意地然后随机分配到干预组(IG)(n = 5)和对照组(CG)(n = 4)。干预组在六个月内每月进行一次群体伦理沟通。在3个月和6个月时使用医疗保健专业人员道德困扰量表(MMD-HP)、道德困扰温度计(MDT)和瑞典伦理氛围问卷(SwECQ)进行前瞻性评估。
组间分析显示,随着时间的推移,道德困扰没有显著差异。组内分析表明,干预组在3个月测量点时在患者层面的临床原因方面的道德困扰得分较低,但在6个月时恢复到与对照组相同的水平。在3个月和6个月时,干预组的伦理氛围评分较高。
参与群体伦理沟通可能会促进共同价值观和增强伦理氛围,尽管在道德困扰方面未观察到显著差异。尽管进行了干预,道德困扰可能仍然存在,但开放的对话和专业成长可以培养道德复原力。本研究发现伦理氛围与使用“一到五方法”参与伦理沟通群体之间存在正相关关系。然而,样本量较小限制了统计效力。未来的研究应包括更大规模的多中心研究和定性研究,以探索群体伦理沟通的经验。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05146102(2021年11月5日)。