• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用时间权衡值估算 EQ-5D-Y 值集:一项探索性研究。

Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study.

机构信息

Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Gui'an, China; College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):968-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.003
PMID:36921897
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The published international EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol does not recommend the composite time trade-off (cTTO) method as the primary valuation method because of 2 major concerns. First, the cTTO method was shown to generate high values. Second, the cTTO method is not as feasible for valuing children's health as other established methods. This study aimed to explore the feasibility of using cTTO values alone to estimate EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets.

METHODS

We analyzed the cTTO data derived from the recently completed Chinese EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation study in which a total of 28 health states were valued. We assessed the feasibility of the cTTO tasks in terms of survey completion time and participant-reported difficulty of understanding the task, differentiating the health states, and deciding the answer. We also examined the data distribution characteristics and modeled the data using different models.

RESULTS

In total, 418 participants completed the cTTO interview. On average, participants took approximately 35.70 minutes (SD 12.42) to complete the interview and made 13.21 moves (SD 9.00) in the cTTO tasks. There were 74.16%, 59.33%, and 11.48% of participants indicated that it was easy to understand the cTTO tasks, easy to differentiate between the health states, and difficult to decide on an indifference point, respectively. The data distribution was smooth, and a random-effects model performed the best in terms of coefficient significance, monotonicity, and predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Our finding suggests that estimating EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets using cTTO data alone is feasible and therefore could be considered as an option in future valuation studies for EQ-5D-Y-3L.

摘要

目的

已发表的国际 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值评估协议不推荐综合时间权衡(cTTO)方法作为主要的评估方法,原因有两点。首先,cTTO 方法生成的数值较高。其次,cTTO 方法对于评估儿童健康状况不如其他既定方法可行。本研究旨在探索单独使用 cTTO 值来估计 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集的可行性。

方法

我们分析了最近完成的中国 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值评估研究中得出的 cTTO 数据,其中总共评估了 28 种健康状况。我们根据调查完成时间和参与者报告的理解任务、区分健康状况和决定答案的难度,评估 cTTO 任务的可行性。我们还检查了数据分布特征,并使用不同的模型对数据进行建模。

结果

共有 418 名参与者完成了 cTTO 访谈。平均而言,参与者完成访谈大约需要 35.70 分钟(SD 12.42),并在 cTTO 任务中做出 13.21 次移动(SD 9.00)。分别有 74.16%、59.33%和 11.48%的参与者表示理解 cTTO 任务容易、区分健康状况容易和难以确定中立点。数据分布平滑,随机效应模型在系数显著性、单调性和预测准确性方面表现最佳。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,仅使用 cTTO 数据估计 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集是可行的,因此可以考虑在未来的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 价值评估研究中作为一种选择。

相似文献

1
Using Time Trade-Off Values to Estimate EQ-5D-Y Value Sets: An Exploratory Study.使用时间权衡值估算 EQ-5D-Y 值集:一项探索性研究。
Value Health. 2023 Jul;26(7):968-973. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China.估算中国的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01216-9. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
3
Testing 2 Alternative Time Trade-Off Methods for Valuation of Children's Health States.测试两种儿童健康状态估值的时间权衡法备选方法。
Value Health. 2024 Jan;27(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
4
Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.基于离散选择实验(DCE)到时间权衡(TTO)值的映射来估计印度尼西亚的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):157-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01210-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
'Like holding the axe on who should live or not': adolescents' and adults' perceptions of valuing children's health states using a standardised valuation protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.“就像拿着斧头决定谁该活谁该死”:青少年和成年人使用 EQ-5D-Y-3L 标准化估值协议评估儿童健康状况的价值观。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Jul;31(7):2133-2142. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03107-0. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Value Set for the EQ-5D-Y-3L in Hungary.匈牙利的 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(Suppl 2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01190-2. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.针对德国人群采用综合时间权衡法对EQ-5D-5L进行估值——一项探索性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0617-9.
8
International Valuation Protocol for the EQ-5D-Y-3L.国际 EQ-5D-Y-3L 量表评估协议
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jul;38(7):653-663. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00909-3.
9
Time and lexicographic preferences in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y with time trade-off methodology.时间权衡法评估 EQ-5D-Y 时的时间和词典偏好。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Mar;24(2):293-305. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01466-6. Epub 2022 May 21.
10
Testing "Pits" Time Trade-Off: Can Data Quality be Improved by Removing Death From Valuation of Health States?检验“ pits”时间权衡法:从健康状态评估中去除死亡是否能提高数据质量?
Value Health. 2024 Sep;27(9):1261-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 23.