Wang Yue, Mo Li, Yu Xin-Xiao, Shi Hua-Ding, Fei Yang
College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.
Technical Centre for Soil, Agriculture and Rural Ecology and Environment, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Beijing 100012, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Mar 8;44(3):1636-1645. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202204271.
In order to understand the heavy metal pollution of the industrial and mining area in northern Guangdong Province, topsoil samples (0-20 cm) from 209 sites in study area were collected, and the concentrations of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn were analyzed. The source and distribution characteristics of Cd, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, As, Cu, and Zn in soil samples were analyzed using the geographic information system (GIS) and principal component analysis (PCA), and the geo-accumulation index and potential ecological hazard index were used to evaluate their pollution status and ecological risk. The results showed that:① Except Ni, all seven heavy metal elements exceeded the national soil background value but were below the pollution risk screening value. The soil environment as a whole was relatively clean. ② The spatial distribution of heavy metals in soil differed. The contents of As and Pb showed northwest-southeast zonal distribution. The contents of Cd, Cu, Hg, and Zn generally decreased from the middle to the surrounding, which was consistent with the industrial and mining enterprise locations. However, the spatial distribution of Cr and Ni had no direct relationship with the location of pollution sources such as industrial enterprises. ③ The eight heavy metals could be identified as three principal components (PCs). PC1 (Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn) was mainly affected by human activities such as lead-zinc deposit dressing, traffic emissions, and agricultural production. However, PC2 (Cr and Ni) was a natural source, mainly affected by soil parent material. In addition, PC3 (As and Hg) was mainly affected by industrial activities such as non-ferrous metal smelting and thermal power generation. ④ According to the geo-accumulation index method, the risk degree of the eight heavy metals was:Cd>As>Zn>Hg>Pb>Cu>Cr=Ni. The contents of Cr and Ni in soil were at a no-risk level; the contents of As, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn were at a low-risk level; and the content of Cd was at a high-risk level. Most potential ecological hazards for single elements in the study area were at a mild risk level. In contrast, a small proportion of the surface soils in areas of intense industrial activity were subject to substantial levels of heavy metal stress and require further attention.
为了解粤北工矿区域的重金属污染状况,采集了研究区域内209个点位的表层土壤样本(0 - 20厘米),并分析了其中砷(As)、镉(Cd)、铬(Cr)、铜(Cu)、汞(Hg)、镍(Ni)、铅(Pb)和锌(Zn)的含量。利用地理信息系统(GIS)和主成分分析(PCA)对土壤样本中镉、铬、汞、镍、铅、砷、铜和锌的来源及分布特征进行了分析,并采用地累积指数和潜在生态危害指数对其污染状况和生态风险进行了评价。结果表明:①除镍以外,其余七种重金属元素均超过国家土壤背景值,但低于污染风险筛选值,土壤环境整体相对清洁。②土壤中重金属的空间分布存在差异。砷和铅的含量呈西北 - 东南向带状分布。镉、铜、汞和锌的含量总体上由中部向周边递减,这与工矿企业的分布位置一致。然而,铬和镍的空间分布与工业企业等污染源位置没有直接关系。③这八种重金属可被识别为三个主成分(PCs)。主成分1(镉、铜、铅和锌)主要受铅锌矿选矿、交通排放和农业生产等人类活动影响。然而,主成分2(铬和镍)为自然源,主要受土壤母质影响。此外,主成分3(砷和汞)主要受有色金属冶炼和火力发电等工业活动影响。④根据地累积指数法,八种重金属的风险程度为:镉>砷>锌>汞>铅>铜>铬 = 镍。土壤中铬和镍的含量处于无风险水平;砷、铜、汞、铅和锌的含量处于低风险水平;镉的含量处于高风险水平。研究区域内大多数单元素潜在生态危害处于轻度风险水平。相比之下,工业活动密集区域的一小部分表层土壤受到较高水平的重金属胁迫,需要进一步关注。