Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04150-2.
Bedside teaching is essential to foster core clinical competences in medical education, especially in Neurology. However, bedside skills are declining and new concepts to enhance the effectiveness of bedside teaching are needed, also in view of limited in-person teaching possibilities in the ongoing pandemic situation. If theoretical knowledge is taught prior to in-person sessions this might allow to better focus on practical application aspects during bedside teaching. We thus aimed to answer the question to what extent such an approach can enhance the effectiveness of neurological bedside teaching.
In this prospective controlled study, neurological bedside courses following a traditional and a flipped classroom (FC) approach were compared with regards to their effects on theoretical knowledge and practical skills of medical students. Evaluations were obtained from 161 students and their lecturers participating in a neurological bedside teaching course at a German university hospital between October 2020 and July 2021. Students were randomly assigned to course dates. However, the 74 students assigned to course dates from May to July 2021 completed a mandatory online preparation course prior to the bedside teaching. These students served as the interventional group (IG) and the remaining 87 students formed the control group (CG). Ratings of knowledge and skills provided by the students and their lecturers on numerical rating scales served as primary outcome measures. Moreover, the time needed to recapitulate theoretical contents during the in-person teaching session was assessed as a secondary outcome measure. Group comparisons were performed using t-statistics.
Theoretical knowledge upon entering the course was rated significantly higher in the IG by the students (p < 0.001) and lecturers (p = 0.003). Lecturers also rated the practical skills of students in the IG significantly higher (p < 0.001). Furthermore, significantly less time was needed to recapitulate theoretical contents during the in-person session in the IG (p = 0.03).
Using a FC approach enhances the effectiveness of in-person neurological bedside teaching. Thus, these concepts are particularly valuable in the ongoing pandemic situation. Moreover, they might allow to reuse e-learning contents developed during the pandemic and to develop future bedside teaching concepts.
床边教学对于培养医学教育中的核心临床能力至关重要,尤其是在神经病学领域。然而,床边技能正在下降,需要新的概念来提高床边教学的效果,特别是考虑到在当前大流行情况下面对面教学的可能性有限。如果在进行面对面教学之前教授理论知识,这可能会使学生在床边教学中更好地关注实践应用方面。因此,我们旨在回答这种方法在多大程度上可以提高神经科床边教学的效果。
在这项前瞻性对照研究中,我们比较了传统教学方法和翻转课堂(FC)方法在神经科床边教学中的效果,比较了它们对医学生理论知识和实践技能的影响。评估来自 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 7 月期间在德国一家大学医院参加神经科床边教学课程的 161 名学生和他们的讲师。学生被随机分配到课程日期。然而,2021 年 5 月至 7 月期间被分配到课程日期的 74 名学生在床边教学之前完成了一门强制性的在线预习课程。这些学生作为干预组(IG),其余 87 名学生作为对照组(CG)。学生和讲师在数字评分量表上提供的知识和技能评分作为主要结果测量指标。此外,还评估了在面对面教学期间回顾理论内容所需的时间作为次要结果测量指标。使用 t 检验进行组间比较。
学生和讲师都认为 IG 在进入课程时的理论知识评分显著更高(p<0.001)。讲师还认为 IG 中学生的实践技能评分显著更高(p<0.001)。此外,IG 中在面对面会议期间回顾理论内容所需的时间明显更短(p=0.03)。
使用 FC 方法可以提高面对面神经科床边教学的效果。因此,在当前大流行期间,这些概念特别有价值。此外,它们可能允许重复使用在大流行期间开发的电子学习内容,并开发未来的床边教学概念。